Comparison Overview

VINCI

VS

PCL Construction

VINCI

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vinci.com

VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in more than 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-round performance, above and beyond economic results, we are committed to operating in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. You can be part of projects that bring lasting change to urban ecosystems and entire regions. Join the team!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 13,939
Subsidiaries: 134
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

PCL Construction

9915-56th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T6E 5L7
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pcl.com

PCL is a group of independent construction companies that carries out work across Canada, the United States, the Caribbean, and in Australia. These diverse operations in the civil infrastructure, heavy industrial, and buildings markets are supported by a strategic presence in 31 major centers. PCL is 100% employee-owned. Watch us build at www.pcl.com

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 12,124
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-construction.jpeg
PCL Construction
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VINCI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PCL Construction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCL Construction in 2026.

Incident History — VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PCL Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCL Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-construction.jpeg
PCL Construction
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PCL Construction company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI and PCL Construction have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, PCL Construction company and VINCI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PCL Construction company has not reported such incidents publicly.

PCL Construction company has disclosed at least one data breach, while VINCI company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PCL Construction company nor VINCI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor PCL Construction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PCL Construction company.

VINCI company employs more people globally than PCL Construction company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VINCI nor PCL Construction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References