Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company Company Cyber Security Posture
utilitytrailer.comThe world's leading producer of strong, lightweight trailers. Utility will continuously improve the standard of living by being the world's leading producer of quality, high value, light weight trailers and other transportation products and services. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company is America's oldest privately owned, family-operated trailer manufacturer. Founded in 1914, our company designs and manufactures dry freight vans, flatbeds, and refrigerated vans. We are the largest producer of refrigerated vans and the exclusive distributor for Cargobull North America ultra-low emissions Transport Refrigeration Units and telematics. Utility currently operates five trailer factories across the United States: two for refrigerated trailers located in Marion, Virginia, and Clearfield, Utah, two for dry vans located in Glade Spring, Virginia, and Paragould, Arkansas, and a flatbed factory in Enterprise, Alabama. We also feature an extensive dealer network with nearly 130 locations throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, and South America. Our historical position as America's largest producer of refrigerated vans is a direct result of our management's focus on providing innovative solutions to customer problems. At Utility, we have always responded to the changing needs of the market, but one thing that will never change is our dedication to providing satisfaction to each of our customers. - See more at: http://www.utilitytrailer.com/company/about-us#sthash.lbrxfrye.dpuf
UTMC Company Details
utility-trailer-manufacturing-company
1232 employees
11925.0
484
Truck Transportation
utilitytrailer.com
Scan still pending
UTI_1044615
In-progress
UTMC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
UTMC Global Score.png)
Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company | Ransomware | 85 | 3 | 05/2021 | UTI124913123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Utility Trailer Manufacturing was targeted in an apparent ransomware attack that exposed the personal information of numerous employees. Utility immediately responded to secure its systems and commenced an investigation into the nature and scope of the event. The company disclosed the incident after the Clop ransomware gang leaked over 5 gigabytes of data to the dark web this week but it did not disclose the extent of the data compromised. | |||||||
Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company Company Subsidiaries
The world's leading producer of strong, lightweight trailers. Utility will continuously improve the standard of living by being the world's leading producer of quality, high value, light weight trailers and other transportation products and services. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company is America's oldest privately owned, family-operated trailer manufacturer. Founded in 1914, our company designs and manufactures dry freight vans, flatbeds, and refrigerated vans. We are the largest producer of refrigerated vans and the exclusive distributor for Cargobull North America ultra-low emissions Transport Refrigeration Units and telematics. Utility currently operates five trailer factories across the United States: two for refrigerated trailers located in Marion, Virginia, and Clearfield, Utah, two for dry vans located in Glade Spring, Virginia, and Paragould, Arkansas, and a flatbed factory in Enterprise, Alabama. We also feature an extensive dealer network with nearly 130 locations throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, and South America. Our historical position as America's largest producer of refrigerated vans is a direct result of our management's focus on providing innovative solutions to customer problems. At Utility, we have always responded to the changing needs of the market, but one thing that will never change is our dedication to providing satisfaction to each of our customers. - See more at: http://www.utilitytrailer.com/company/about-us#sthash.lbrxfrye.dpuf
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
UTMC Cyber Security News
New trade policies bring the true costs more into focus for manufacturers
Husco faces a growing list of trade policies under the new administration of President Donald Trump that have jumbled investment plans and cast a shadow over ...
Trailer maker Utility targeted in ransomware attack
An apparent ransomware attack has targeted Utility Trailer Manufacturing, one of the largest U.S. manufacturers of trailers for commercial ...
Freight scams go cyber
As cyberattacks on the transportation sector mount, so do the losses, which now run into the billions of dollars each year.
US manufacturers predict growth in 2025 after prolonged slump
"They are optimistic about overall business prospects for the first half of 2025 and more excited about faster growth in the second half.".
Protect your cargo from cyberattack
No one is safe from cyber attacks, and cargo ships, trucks, and planes in transit are particularly valuable targets.
US business activity rises in October; price pressures easing
U.S. business activity increased in October amid strong demand, and firms raised prices for goods and services at the slowest pace in nearly ...
Ransomware gang behind Utility, CSX attacks feels heat in Ukraine
The ransomware gang attempted to extort California-based Utility Trailer Manufacturing in May by leaking 5 gigabytes of stolen data to the dark ...
Cargo trailer manufacturer to create 70 jobs in Crossett
The company plans to hire 70 new, full-time employees within 24 months. Workers for hire include carpenters, welders, and electricians. Cynergy ...
US manufacturing output increases in March; February data revised higher
Manufacturing output rose 0.5% last month after an upwardly revised 1.2% rebound in the prior month, the Federal Reserve said on Tuesday.
UTMC Similar Companies
Veolia Transport
* Incorporate all transportation options seamlessly into the region * Offer a coordinated, smooth, interlocking transportation system * Provide each rider with high-quality service * Make our employees central to our business plan * Make tangible, measurable improvements to the e
Total Quality Logistics
The logistics industry is a $500 billion market. With annual sales over $8 billion, Total Quality Logistics (TQL) is one of the largest freight brokerage firms in the nation. TQL connects customers with truckload freight that needs to be moved with quality carriers who have the capacity to move it.
The Kowloon Motor Bus Company (1933) Limited
Established in 1933, The Kowloon Motor Bus Company (1933) Limited ("KMB") is the largest franchised bus operator in Hong Kong, serving more than 2.8 million passenger-trips each day. A workforce of more than 12,300 employees, including some 10,000 bus captains, ensures that customers enjoy high-qual
STEF
STEF group is the European leader for temperature controlled logistics and transport. Our 22,000 employees in 8 countries are dedicated to serve everyday agrifood, distribution, foodservice and seafood players with the highest standards of security, rapidity and quality. The group relies on a wide
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics
At DSV, we keep supply chains flowing in a world of change. We provide and manage supply chain solutions for thousands of companies every day – from small family-run businesses to large global corporations. Our reach is global, yet our presence is local and close to our customers. Approx. 75,000 e
Grimaldi Group
Established in 1947, Grimaldi is a fully integrated multinational logistics Group specialising in maritime transport of cars, rolling cargo, containers and passengers. Wholly owned by the Grimaldi family, the Group is led by Gianluca and Emanuele Grimaldi, sons of the founder Guido, and their broth
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
UTMC CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, UTMC has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Ransomware'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as The world's leading producer of strong, lightweight trailers. Utility will continuously improve the standard of living by being the world's leading producer of quality, high value, light weight trailers and other transportation products and services. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company is America's oldest privately owned, family-operated trailer manufacturer. Founded in 1914, our company designs and manufactures dry freight vans, flatbeds, and refrigerated vans. We are the largest producer of refrigerated vans and the exclusive distributor for Cargobull North America ultra-low emissions Transport Refrigeration Units and telematics. Utility currently operates five trailer factories across the United States: two for refrigerated trailers located in Marion, Virginia, and Clearfield, Utah, two for dry vans located in Glade Spring, Virginia, and Paragould, Arkansas, and a flatbed factory in Enterprise, Alabama. We also feature an extensive dealer network with nearly 130 locations throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, and South America. Our historical position as America's largest producer of refrigerated vans is a direct result of our management's focus on providing innovative solutions to customer problems. At Utility, we have always responded to the changing needs of the market, but one thing that will never change is our dedication to providing satisfaction to each of our customers. - See more at: http://www.utilitytrailer.com/company/about-us#sthash.lbrxfrye.dpuf.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
