UT Physicians Company Cyber Security Posture

utphysicians.com

Dedicated to patient safety and clinical effectiveness, UT Physicians is the clinical practice of McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston. Established in 1972 by The University of Texas System Board of Regents, UTHealth Houston, a 2023 Houston Chronicle Top Workplace recipient, is Texasโ€™ resource for health care education, innovation, scientific discovery, and excellence in patient care. With more than 2,000 clinicians certified in more than 80 specialties, UT Physicians has locations across Greater Houston. If you are interested in applying for a job in our fast-paced, growing clinical practice, go here: UTPhysicians.com/careers/. Join our Talent Community to learn more about the incredible opportunities awaiting you! Get noticed by recruiters here: https://careers.uth.tmc.edu/us/en/jointalentcommunity.

UT Physicians Company Details

Linkedin ID:

ut-physicians

Employees number:

840 employees

Number of followers:

5981.0

NAICS:

62

Industry Type:

Hospitals and Health Care

Homepage:

utphysicians.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

UT _3068061

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreUT Physicians Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 900

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreUT Physicians Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

UT Physicians Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 800 and 900

UT Physicians Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
UT PhysiciansBreach85406/2018UTP15117722Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A clinic owned by the physician organization of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston improperly sent out mass emails containing the email addresses of many of its patients. There were 19 such emails, each of which made visible the email addresses of anywhere from 100 to 300 other people. In all, 2,800 email addresses were shared. The letters to impacted patients went out Tuesday. The content did not include any individual health information, physical addresses, Social Security numbers, or diagnostic, insurance, or other financial information. UT Physicians regrets this incident and it encouraged patients who received the email to monitor their accounts and refrain from opening emails from unfamiliar addresses.

UT Physicians Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Dedicated to patient safety and clinical effectiveness, UT Physicians is the clinical practice of McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston. Established in 1972 by The University of Texas System Board of Regents, UTHealth Houston, a 2023 Houston Chronicle Top Workplace recipient, is Texasโ€™ resource for health care education, innovation, scientific discovery, and excellence in patient care. With more than 2,000 clinicians certified in more than 80 specialties, UT Physicians has locations across Greater Houston. If you are interested in applying for a job in our fast-paced, growing clinical practice, go here: UTPhysicians.com/careers/. Join our Talent Community to learn more about the incredible opportunities awaiting you! Get noticed by recruiters here: https://careers.uth.tmc.edu/us/en/jointalentcommunity.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=ut-physicians' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

UT Physicians Cyber Security News

2025-04-09T07:00:00.000Z
NSA-Approved: UT Dallas Earns National Designation for Cybersecurity Research & Education

The University of Texas at Dallas has been redesignated as a National Center of Academic Excellence in Cybersecurity for cyber research forย ...

2024-10-17T07:00:00.000Z
Cybersecurity attack continues impact at West Texas hospitals after three weeks

On Sept. 26, the UMC Health System was hit with a ransomware attack. As the only Level 1 trauma center in West Texas had to divert patients,ย ...

2024-12-18T17:28:25.000Z
Join our team

Discover your career at Intermountain Health where you'll find inspiration, flexibility, employment stability, benefits, and a lifetime of challenging careerย ...

2024-09-25T07:00:00.000Z
Elitecare Emergency Hospital suffers healthcare data breach

Elitecare Emergency Hospital notified 24,754 individuals of a cybersecurity incident that resulted in a healthcare data breach.

2024-10-01T07:00:00.000Z
2 West Texas healthcare systems impacted by IT outage, 1 confirmed ransomware attack.

Two West Texas-area healthcare entities are almost a week into an IT outage, with one confirmed ransomware attack. Here's what we know.

2024-01-23T08:00:00.000Z
UT Health says some clients personal data breached in cybersecurity incident

UT Health Tyler announced that it is notifying certain individuals whose personal information was involved in a recent cybersecurity incident.

2024-03-15T07:00:00.000Z
HIPAA Privacy Security Breach May Affect Some Patients Treated by UT Health Science Center Physicians at a Memphis Partner Hospital

A Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) breach was recently discovered, which might affect the privacy and securityย ...

2023-11-27T08:00:00.000Z
Outage at East Texas hospital identified as ransomware attack

The security incident last week that caused a network outage at UT Health East Texas has now been identified as a ransomware attack.

2024-05-08T07:00:00.000Z
Ascension investigating after suspected ransomware attack

Ascension is investigating after a cybersecurity incident on Wednesday, May 8, working "around the clock" to restore functions.

similarCompanies

UT Physicians Similar Companies

Health New Zealand | Waitaha Canterbury

Health New Zealand - Waitaha Canterbury is transforming the delivery of health care services and is recognised in New Zealand and overseas for our extraordinary journey. We are leading the world delivering integrated and connected health care services that put patientโ€šร„รดs right at the heart. Ev

South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD)

Welcome to South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD). Our vision is 'Working Together to Improve the Health and Wellbeing of our Community' which is patient focused and respects the diverse and developing health needs of our communities. At the CORE of our organisation is a set of values

A Amil รฉ uma empresa do setor de saรบde que atua no Brasil combinando expertise e lideranรงa para coordenar todos os agentes desse mercado - criando relaรงรตes sustentรกveis para conhecer e atender ร s necessidades de cada cliente e permitir que ele aproveite o melhor da vida. Diariamente, nos preocupamo

Unimed BH

A Unimed-BH รฉ a operadora que mais investe na saรบde dos mineiros. Sรฃo 6 milhรตes de consultas mรฉdicas, 120 mil internaรงรตes hospitalares e 13 milhรตes de exames e terapias complementares realizados em um ano. E a Cooperativa estรก sempre inovando, com serviรงos diferenciados, como o Agendamento On-lin

Lifespan

Lifespan, Rhode Island's first health system, was founded in 1994 by Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital. A comprehensive, integrated, academic health system, Lifespanโ€™s present partners also include RI Hospitalโ€™s Hasbro Children's Hospital , Bradley Hospital, and Newport Hospital. A not

Ramsay Santรฉ

After the acquisition of the Capio Group in 2018, Ramsay Santรฉ has become Europe's leading private hospital and primary care companies. The group now has 36,000 employees and works with nearly 8,600 private practitioners. Present in 5 countries, France, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Italy, the group

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

UT Physicians CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, UT Physicians has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Dedicated to patient safety and clinical effectiveness, UT Physicians is the clinical practice of McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston. Established in 1972 by The University of Texas System Board of Regents, UTHealth Houston, a 2023 Houston Chronicle Top Workplace recipient, is Texasโ€™ resource for health care education, innovation, scientific discovery, and excellence in patient care. With more than 2,000 clinicians certified in more than 80 specialties, UT Physicians has locations across Greater Houston. If you are interested in applying for a job in our fast-paced, growing clinical practice, go here: UTPhysicians.com/careers/. Join our Talent Community to learn more about the incredible opportunities awaiting you! Get noticed by recruiters here: https://careers.uth.tmc.edu/us/en/jointalentcommunity..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge