Comparison Overview

UnityPoint Health

VS

University of Maryland Medical System

UnityPoint Health

1776 West Lakes Parkway,, West Des Moines, 50266, US
Last Update: 2026-03-25
Between 750 and 799

As an integrated health system, we provide care throughout Iowa, western Illinois and southern Wisconsin in not-for-profit hospitals, clinics and home health settings. Each year, we serve nearly 8 million patient visits of all different types, including around 100,000 surgeries and deliver more than 20,000 babies. Whatever stage of life you’re in, our goal is to make your care easier and more personal. At UnityPoint Health, we put people first. And we start from the inside out. We care deeply about making UnityPoint Health a great place to work because our team members are the compassionate core of who we are and how we serve. We’re proud to be recognized as a Top 150 Place to Work in Healthcare by Becker’s Healthcare for four years in a row. We've worked diligently to invest in our team members across key areas, including: o Team Member Empowerment o Leadership Effectiveness o Community Impact and Engagement o Career Development Visit www.unitypoint.org/join-our-team to explore career opportunities at UnityPoint Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,005
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

University of Maryland Medical System

22 S. Greene St, Baltimore, 21201, US
Last Update: 2026-03-23
Between 750 and 799

The University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS) was created in 1984 when the state-owned University Hospital became a private, nonprofit organization. It has evolved into a multi-hospital system with academic, community and specialty service missions reaching every part of the state and beyond. UMMS is a national and regional referral center for trauma, cancer care, neurocare, cardiac care, women's and children's health and physical rehabilitation. It also has one of the world's largest kidney transplant programs, as well as scores of other programs that improve the physical and mental health of thousands of people daily. The hospitals and health systems that comprise UMMS are: University of Maryland Medical Center University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus UM Rehabilitation and Orthopaedic Institute UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center UM Capital Region Health UM Charles Regional Medical Center UM St. Joseph Medical Center UM Upper Chesapeake Health UM Shore Regional Health Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital UM Community Medical Group

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,445
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unity-point-health.jpeg
UnityPoint Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ummedicalsystem.jpeg
University of Maryland Medical System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UnityPoint Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Maryland Medical System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UnityPoint Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland Medical System in 2026.

Incident History — UnityPoint Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UnityPoint Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Maryland Medical System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland Medical System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unity-point-health.jpeg
UnityPoint Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ummedicalsystem.jpeg
University of Maryland Medical System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Maryland Medical System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UnityPoint Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UnityPoint Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Maryland Medical System company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Maryland Medical System company and UnityPoint Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Maryland Medical System company nor UnityPoint Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UnityPoint Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other University of Maryland Medical System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Maryland Medical System company nor UnityPoint Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UnityPoint Health company nor University of Maryland Medical System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Maryland Medical System company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UnityPoint Health company.

University of Maryland Medical System company employs more people globally than UnityPoint Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UnityPoint Health nor University of Maryland Medical System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N