Comparison Overview

United Rentals

VS

STRABAG

United Rentals

100 First Stamford Place, Suite 700, Stamford, CT, US, 06902
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unitedrentals.com

As North America’s largest equipment rental company, with 1600+ stores across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, we serve construction and industrial companies, utilities, municipalities, homeowners, and communities, with the goal of fulfilling customer needs and surpassing expectations. We go beyond equipment. We are the world’s largest fleet of problem solvers, with best-in-class specialty solutions, safety training and 24/7 support to empower your success. For more updates - Follow us on Twitter: www.UnitedRentals.com/Twitter Like us on Facebook: www.UnitedRentals.com/Facebook Join us on Google+: www.UnitedRentals.com/Google See more videos: www.UnitedRentals.com/YouTube

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,582
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, 9800, AT
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
https://karriere.strabag.com

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, underground engineering, bridge building, tunnelling, construction material production, project development or building management – we are always one step ahead so that we can become the most innovative and sustainable construction technology company in Europe. Diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities are integral to this, who we are as a company and how we work. Together we work as partners to complete projects successfully and grow with new challenges. Together we achieve great things. Let’s progress!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 21,228
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Rentals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
STRABAG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Rentals in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2026.

Incident History — United Rentals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Rentals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Rentals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to STRABAG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, STRABAG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Rentals company.

In the current year, STRABAG company and United Rentals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither STRABAG company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither STRABAG company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither STRABAG company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Rentals company nor STRABAG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United Rentals company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to STRABAG company.

STRABAG company employs more people globally than United Rentals company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Rentals nor STRABAG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References