Comparison Overview

United Rentals

VS

Skanska

United Rentals

100 First Stamford Place, Suite 700, Stamford, CT, US, 06902
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unitedrentals.com

As North America’s largest equipment rental company, with 1600+ stores across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, we serve construction and industrial companies, utilities, municipalities, homeowners, and communities, with the goal of fulfilling customer needs and surpassing expectations. We go beyond equipment. We are the world’s largest fleet of problem solvers, with best-in-class specialty solutions, safety training and 24/7 support to empower your success. For more updates - Follow us on Twitter: www.UnitedRentals.com/Twitter Like us on Facebook: www.UnitedRentals.com/Facebook Join us on Google+: www.UnitedRentals.com/Google See more videos: www.UnitedRentals.com/YouTube

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,582
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Skanska

Warfvinges väg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, SE, SE-112 74
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skanska.com

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 138 years in the making, we’re one of the world’s largest development and construction companies, with 2024 revenue totaling SEK 177 billion. We operate in select markets throughout the Nordics, Europe and the United States. Together with our customers and the collective expertise of our 26,300 + teammates, we create innovative and sustainable solutions that support healthy living beyond our lifetime. Founded in Sweden in 1887 as a maker of concrete, we were driven by a dual purpose: to innovate and build what’s good for people and society. Today we develop, design and build everything from healthy and green office buildings to smart homes and infrastructure. We partner to innovate, and we continue to hold our founding values at the heart of everything we do. Skanska Linkedin Page House Rules We welcome and encourage participation. However, there are some rules we ask everyone to follow in order to maintain a friendly and respectful community. We will remove any posted content that is not aligned with Skanska's values and Code of Conduct, including: Text, images or video containing profanity, sexually graphic or offensive language, spam, illegal content – laws that govern the use of copyrights, trade secrets, etc. will be followed.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 23,492
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skanska.jpeg
Skanska
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Rentals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Skanska
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Rentals in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2026.

Incident History — United Rentals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Rentals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skanska.jpeg
Skanska
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Rentals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Skanska company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Skanska company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Rentals company.

In the current year, Skanska company and United Rentals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Skanska company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Skanska company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Skanska company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Rentals company nor Skanska company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United Rentals company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Skanska company.

Skanska company employs more people globally than United Rentals company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Rentals nor Skanska holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References