Comparison Overview

United Rentals

VS

ALEC Holdings

United Rentals

100 First Stamford Place, Suite 700, Stamford, CT, US, 06902
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

As North America’s largest equipment rental company, with 1600+ stores across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, we serve construction and industrial companies, utilities, municipalities, homeowners, and communities, with the goal of fulfilling customer needs and surpassing expectations. We go beyond equipment. We are the world’s largest fleet of problem solvers, with best-in-class specialty solutions, safety training and 24/7 support to empower your success. For more updates - Follow us on Twitter: www.UnitedRentals.com/Twitter Like us on Facebook: www.UnitedRentals.com/Facebook Join us on Google+: www.UnitedRentals.com/Google See more videos: www.UnitedRentals.com/YouTube

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,582
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, 3601 - Marina Plaza, Dubai Marina, Dubai, U.A.E., Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 27639
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, and aesthetics. ALEC Holdings offers its clients complete turnkey solutions in construction, MEP, fit-out, marine, oil & gas, modular construction, energy efficiency and solar projects, heavy equipment rental, technology systems, data centers and asset maintenance. With these capabilities, the company successfully serves a diverse range of sectors including airports, retail, hotels & resorts, high-rise buildings, and themed projects.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,125
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Rentals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ALEC Holdings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Rentals in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2026.

Incident History — United Rentals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Rentals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rentals.jpeg
United Rentals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Rentals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ALEC Holdings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Rentals company.

In the current year, ALEC Holdings company and United Rentals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor United Rentals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Rentals company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ALEC Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to United Rentals company.

United Rentals company employs more people globally than ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Rentals nor ALEC Holdings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H