Comparison Overview

University of Florida

VS

University of Oklahoma

University of Florida

355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 2026-03-29
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://UF.edu

University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of established programs in international education, research and service. It was founded in 1853 and is based in Gainesville, Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,956
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Oklahoma

660 N Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma, US, 73019
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://ou.edu

Attracting top students from across the nation and more than 100 countries around the world, OU provides a major university experience in a private college atmosphere. In fact, OU is number one in the nation in the number of National Merit Scholars enrolled at a public university, and is in the top five of public universities in the nation in the graduation of Rhodes Scholars. OU has emerged as a pacesetter for public higher education in the United States and is ranked by The Princeton Review among the top 10 public universities in the nation in terms of academic excellence and cost for students. Specialties Architecture, Arts & Sciences, Atmospheric & Geographic Sciences, Business, Engineering, Fine Arts, International Studies, Journalism, Law

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,504
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-oklahoma.jpeg
University of Oklahoma
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Oklahoma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Oklahoma in 2026.

Incident History — University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-oklahoma.jpeg
University of Oklahoma
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2002
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Lax privacy settings in a campus file-sharing network
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Oklahoma company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Oklahoma company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Florida company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Oklahoma company and University of Florida company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Oklahoma company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

University of Oklahoma company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Florida company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Oklahoma company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Florida company nor University of Oklahoma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Florida company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Oklahoma company.

University of Florida company employs more people globally than University of Oklahoma company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Oklahoma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References