Comparison Overview

University of Florida

VS

Colorado State University

University of Florida

355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 2026-03-29
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://UF.edu

University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of established programs in international education, research and service. It was founded in 1853 and is based in Gainesville, Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,956
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Colorado State University

102 Administration Building, Fort Collins, co, US, 80523-0100
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
http://colostate.edu

At Colorado State, there’s this energy we all share—this undeniable excitement for what’s next. And it’s a feeling you can only find here. As you choose a college, one of the biggest questions most students have is what to study. At Colorado State, we offer over 250 programs, over 50 minors, and several advising tracks. That means you’ll have the ability to reach your goals — no matter what they are. Founded in 1870 as the Colorado Agricultural College, Colorado State University is now among the nation's leading research universities. Our world-class research in infectious disease, atmospheric science, clean energy technologies, environmental science, and biomedical technology attracted more than $300 million in research funding annually. Our professional programs in veterinary medicine, occupational therapy, journalism, agriculture and construction management are ranked among the nation's best. Colorado State is the "university of choice"​ for Colorado residents; 30% of all of Colorado's science, math, engineering and technology majors pursue degrees at CSU. This is LinkedIn account is officially recognized by Colorado State University; however, the views and opinions expressed on this page are not necessarily those of the University. CSU retains discretion to allow or disallow comments and/or posts on this page. For more information about CSU’s Social Media Policy, visit http://www.socialmedia.colostate.edu.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,166
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-state-university.jpeg
Colorado State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorado State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado State University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorado State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-state-university.jpeg
Colorado State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado State University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Colorado State University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Florida company.

In the current year, Colorado State University company and University of Florida company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorado State University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colorado State University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colorado State University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Florida company nor Colorado State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Colorado State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Florida company.

University of Florida company employs more people globally than Colorado State University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Colorado State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References