
UCPA Company Cyber Security Posture
ucpa.comUCPA Union nationale des Centres Sportifs de Plein Air ¬“45 ans de passion au service du sport et de la jeunesse » L'UCPA est une association āā but non lucratif de loi 1901 crāĀ©āĀ©e en 1965. C'est une union d'associations unique en France, composāĀ©e uniquement de personnes morales. Elle est administrāĀ©e par les pouvoirs publics, dont les ministāĀ®res en charge de la SantāĀ©, de la Jeunesse, des Sports et de la Vie associative, les collectivitāĀ©s territoriales ainsi que par les grands mouvements de jeunesse et d'āĀ©ducation populaire franāĆais, qui en assurent par alternance la prāĀ©sidence, et par les principales fāĀ©dāĀ©rations sportives de sports de plein air. L'association UCPA inscrit son projet humaniste, social et citoyen dans le prolongement du service public, et participe āā la mise en āƬuvre des politiques publiques destināĀ©es āā la jeunesse. L'UCPA rāĀ©pond āā trois missions, qui se dāĀ©clinent en trois māĀ©tiers, au service de l'ensemble des jeunes europāĀ©ens, āĀ¢gāĀ©s de 6 āā 39 ans. LāĆĆ“UCPA en chiffres : 45 annāĀ©es dāĆĆ“expāĀ©rience PrāĀ®s de 80 activitāĀ©s sportives 139 sites de pratique dont 21 āā lāĆĆ“āĀ©tranger Une trentaine de croisiāĀ®res proposāĀ©es 320 programmes itināĀ©rants Une prāĀ©sence dans plus de 70 pays 220 000 stagiaires accueillis chaque annāĀ©e dont 87 000 mineurs Plus dāĆĆ“1 million dāĆĆ“heures de cours dispensāĀ© tous les ans dans le cadre des loisirs sportifs 1 600 jeunes accueillis par an en formation professionnelle 412 000 heures de formation dispensāĀ©es par lāĆĆ“Institut de formation aux māĀ©tiers de sport et de lāĆĆ“animation 90 000 jeunes bāĀ©nāĀ©ficiaires dāĆĆ“actions de solidaritāĀ© 730 salariāĀ©s permanents de 950 (aux mois de novembre) āā 3 130 (aux mois dāĆĆ“aoāĀŖt) salariāĀ©s en CDD 154 millions dāĆĆ“euros de chiffre dāĆĆ“affaires annuel PrāĀ®s de 9 millions de stagiaires accueillis depuis la crāĀ©ation de lāĆĆ“UCPA
UCPA Company Details
ucpa
10,001+ employees
25192
561
Travel Arrangements
ucpa.com
Scan still pending
UCP_1601717
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

UCPA Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
UCPA Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|
UCPA Company Subsidiaries

UCPA Union nationale des Centres Sportifs de Plein Air ¬“45 ans de passion au service du sport et de la jeunesse » L'UCPA est une association āā but non lucratif de loi 1901 crāĀ©āĀ©e en 1965. C'est une union d'associations unique en France, composāĀ©e uniquement de personnes morales. Elle est administrāĀ©e par les pouvoirs publics, dont les ministāĀ®res en charge de la SantāĀ©, de la Jeunesse, des Sports et de la Vie associative, les collectivitāĀ©s territoriales ainsi que par les grands mouvements de jeunesse et d'āĀ©ducation populaire franāĆais, qui en assurent par alternance la prāĀ©sidence, et par les principales fāĀ©dāĀ©rations sportives de sports de plein air. L'association UCPA inscrit son projet humaniste, social et citoyen dans le prolongement du service public, et participe āā la mise en āƬuvre des politiques publiques destināĀ©es āā la jeunesse. L'UCPA rāĀ©pond āā trois missions, qui se dāĀ©clinent en trois māĀ©tiers, au service de l'ensemble des jeunes europāĀ©ens, āĀ¢gāĀ©s de 6 āā 39 ans. LāĆĆ“UCPA en chiffres : 45 annāĀ©es dāĆĆ“expāĀ©rience PrāĀ®s de 80 activitāĀ©s sportives 139 sites de pratique dont 21 āā lāĆĆ“āĀ©tranger Une trentaine de croisiāĀ®res proposāĀ©es 320 programmes itināĀ©rants Une prāĀ©sence dans plus de 70 pays 220 000 stagiaires accueillis chaque annāĀ©e dont 87 000 mineurs Plus dāĆĆ“1 million dāĆĆ“heures de cours dispensāĀ© tous les ans dans le cadre des loisirs sportifs 1 600 jeunes accueillis par an en formation professionnelle 412 000 heures de formation dispensāĀ©es par lāĆĆ“Institut de formation aux māĀ©tiers de sport et de lāĆĆ“animation 90 000 jeunes bāĀ©nāĀ©ficiaires dāĆĆ“actions de solidaritāĀ© 730 salariāĀ©s permanents de 950 (aux mois de novembre) āā 3 130 (aux mois dāĆĆ“aoāĀŖt) salariāĀ©s en CDD 154 millions dāĆĆ“euros de chiffre dāĆĆ“affaires annuel PrāĀ®s de 9 millions de stagiaires accueillis depuis la crāĀ©ation de lāĆĆ“UCPA
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
UCPA Cyber Security News
Utah Updates Consumer Privacy and Protection Acts with AI-Focused Provisions
Effective May 1, 2024, companies must face new artificial intelligence (AI) disclosure requirements in Utah. The Utah AI Policy Act (AI Act)Ā ...
What Utahās new data privacy protection laws mean for you
Utah is at the frontier of consumer privacy, becoming the first US state to pass a law focused on social media privacy rights for children.
What Stricter Data Privacy Laws Mean for Your Cybersecurity Policies
The stronger your password policy, the more protected your IT systems are from malicious cyber-attacks. Fortunately, you can easily strengthenĀ ...
The Utah Consumer Privacy Act: Utah Becomes Fourth US State with Comprehensive Privacy Law
The Utah Consumer Privacy Act protects Utah residents and grants them certain rights concerning their personal data. ... Notably, unlike the CPRA,Ā ...
Utah: 2023 privacy updates
The Utah Consumer Privacy Act (UCPA), which entered into force on December 31, 2023, functions as comprehensive privacy legislation in Utah.
Navigating the Evolving Landscape of State Consumer Privacy Laws ā Publications
VIRGINIA-STYLE. Virginia was the second US state to pass a comprehensive data privacy law, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA).
A new era of privacy laws takes shape in the United States
The year 2023 would go down in history as marking the beginning of a profound shift in the philosophy underlying data privacy laws in the United States.

UCPA Similar Companies

Costa Crociere S.p.A.
Costa belongs to the Carnival Corporation & plc Group, listed on the London and New York stock exchanges, the largest cruise company in the world. Costa, the only Italian cruise company flying the Italian flag, has been sailing the worldās seas for more than 75 years, offering its guests a differe

Enterprise Mobility
At Enterprise Mobility⢠we are paving a new way forward by creating better experiences for how we move. We give people around the world the ability to connect in ways that suit their unique needs. Itās a bold idea that has defined our purpose-led, people-first organization for over 65 years, and itā

Avis Budget Group
Avis Budget Group, Inc. is a leading global provider of transportation solutions, both through its Avis and Budget brands, which have more than 11,000 rental locations in approximately 180 countries around the world, and through its Zipcar brand, which is the world's leading car sharing network, wit

Europcar Mobility Group
Europcar Mobility Group is a global mobility player, with 75 years of mobility services expertise and a leading position in Europe. āWe help to change the way you moveā is what we stand for and brings us together. More than ever, we're committed to delivering simple, seamless, innovative solutions

MSC Cruises
Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC Cruises is the worldās third largest cruise lines and the market leader in Europe, South America, the Middle East and Southern Africa, with a strong and growing presence in North America and the Far East. The MSC Cruises fleet consists of 22 modern ships wi

Enterprise Mobility
At Enterprise Mobility⢠we are paving a new way forward by creating better experiences for how we move. We give people around the world the ability to connect in ways that suit their unique needs. Itās a bold idea that has defined our purpose-led, people-first organization for over 65 years, and itā

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
UCPA CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, UCPA has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, UCPA has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as UCPA Union nationale des Centres Sportifs de Plein Air ¬“45 ans de passion au service du sport et de la jeunesse » L'UCPA est une association āā but non lucratif de loi 1901 crāĀ©āĀ©e en 1965. C'est une union d'associations unique en France, composāĀ©e uniquement de personnes morales. Elle est administrāĀ©e par les pouvoirs publics, dont les ministāĀ®res en charge de la SantāĀ©, de la Jeunesse, des Sports et de la Vie associative, les collectivitāĀ©s territoriales ainsi que par les grands mouvements de jeunesse et d'āĀ©ducation populaire franāĆais, qui en assurent par alternance la prāĀ©sidence, et par les principales fāĀ©dāĀ©rations sportives de sports de plein air. L'association UCPA inscrit son projet humaniste, social et citoyen dans le prolongement du service public, et participe āā la mise en āƬuvre des politiques publiques destināĀ©es āā la jeunesse. L'UCPA rāĀ©pond āā trois missions, qui se dāĀ©clinent en trois māĀ©tiers, au service de l'ensemble des jeunes europāĀ©ens, āĀ¢gāĀ©s de 6 āā 39 ans. LāĆĆ“UCPA en chiffres : 45 annāĀ©es dāĆĆ“expāĀ©rience PrāĀ®s de 80 activitāĀ©s sportives 139 sites de pratique dont 21 āā lāĆĆ“āĀ©tranger Une trentaine de croisiāĀ®res proposāĀ©es 320 programmes itināĀ©rants Une prāĀ©sence dans plus de 70 pays 220 000 stagiaires accueillis chaque annāĀ©e dont 87 000 mineurs Plus dāĆĆ“1 million dāĆĆ“heures de cours dispensāĀ© tous les ans dans le cadre des loisirs sportifs 1 600 jeunes accueillis par an en formation professionnelle 412 000 heures de formation dispensāĀ©es par lāĆĆ“Institut de formation aux māĀ©tiers de sport et de lāĆĆ“animation 90 000 jeunes bāĀ©nāĀ©ficiaires dāĆĆ“actions de solidaritāĀ© 730 salariāĀ©s permanents de 950 (aux mois de novembre) āā 3 130 (aux mois dāĆĆ“aoāĀŖt) salariāĀ©s en CDD 154 millions dāĆĆ“euros de chiffre dāĆĆ“affaires annuel PrāĀ®s de 9 millions de stagiaires accueillis depuis la crāĀ©ation de lāĆĆ“UCPA.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
