TÜV SÜD Company Cyber Security Posture
tuvsud.comTÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and capitalize on technological developments. We specialize in testing, certification, auditing, and advisory services for different industries. Since 1866, we have remained committed to our purpose of enabling progress by protecting people, the environment, and assets from technology related risks. Innovation brings sweeping changes and impacts our work and live in countless ways. At TÜV SÜD, we are dedicated to being a part of that progress. By anticipating technological developments and facilitating change, we inspire trust. Going beyond regulatory compliance, we inspire trust in a physical and digital world to create a safer and more sustainable future. We do not just dream about the future; we actively shape it. Through more than 28,000 employees across over 1,000 locations, we add value to customers and partners by enabling market access and managing risks. We never stop challenging ourselves for the safety of people and society as a whole. We breathe technology, we strive for professional excellence, and we leave a mark. #FutureInYourHands #AddValue #InspireTrust Further information is available at www.tuvsud.com TÜV SÜD AG: Board of Management: Johannes Bussmann (Chairman) Ishan Palit Imprint: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/imprint Data privacy: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/privacy-statement
TÜV SÜD Company Details
tuvsud
16122 employees
395569.0
922
Public Safety
tuvsud.com
Scan still pending
TÜV_1561281
In-progress
TÜV SÜD Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
TÜV SÜD Global Score.png)
TÜV SÜD Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
TÜV SÜD Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
TÜV SÜD Company Subsidiaries
TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and capitalize on technological developments. We specialize in testing, certification, auditing, and advisory services for different industries. Since 1866, we have remained committed to our purpose of enabling progress by protecting people, the environment, and assets from technology related risks. Innovation brings sweeping changes and impacts our work and live in countless ways. At TÜV SÜD, we are dedicated to being a part of that progress. By anticipating technological developments and facilitating change, we inspire trust. Going beyond regulatory compliance, we inspire trust in a physical and digital world to create a safer and more sustainable future. We do not just dream about the future; we actively shape it. Through more than 28,000 employees across over 1,000 locations, we add value to customers and partners by enabling market access and managing risks. We never stop challenging ourselves for the safety of people and society as a whole. We breathe technology, we strive for professional excellence, and we leave a mark. #FutureInYourHands #AddValue #InspireTrust Further information is available at www.tuvsud.com TÜV SÜD AG: Board of Management: Johannes Bussmann (Chairman) Ishan Palit Imprint: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/imprint Data privacy: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/privacy-statement
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
TÜV SÜD Cyber Security News
NVIDIA DRIVE Hyperion Platform Achieves Critical Automotive Safety and Cybersecurity Milestones for AV Development
DRIVE Hyperion™ is the industry's first and only end-to-end autonomous driving platform. It includes the DRIVE AGX™ system-on-a-chip (SoC) and ...
Sungrow’s Logger1000 Achieves the EN 18031 EU Cybersecurity Certification by TÜV SÜD
Sungrow has achieved a significant milestone as its Logger1000 recently became one of the first products in the PV industry to obtain the ...
The cybersecurity checklist for CNC machine tools
Cyberattacks on machine tools are a real threat. Current SINUMERIK CNCs already offer comprehensive cybersecurity features as standard, and comprehensive IT ...
Konecranes achieves cybersecurity certification
Konecranes has obtained the internationally recognised IEC 62443-4-1 cybersecurity certification for its Port Solutions and Industrial Equipment products.
Quectel EG91-EX LTE Cat 1 Module Receives EU RED Cybersecurity Certification
It is with great satisfaction that we observe Quectel, a preeminent provider of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions, facilitating a multitude of ...
NVIDIA's AV Platform Earns Critical Safety Certifications as Toyota, Aurora Join Growing Partner List
The timing couldn't be better for NVIDIA, as Toyota announces its decision to build its next-generation vehicles on their DRIVE AGX Orin ...
Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs Showcases Decent Cybersecurity at Innovation Day on Cybersecurity
The company develops proprietary algorithms and provides quantum-resistant cybersecurity solutions primarily focused on critical infrastructure, ...
NVIDIA Launches DRIVE AI Systems Inspection Lab, Achieves New Industry Safety Milestones
A new NVIDIA DRIVE AI Systems Inspection Lab will help automotive ecosystem partners navigate evolving industry standards for autonomous vehicle ...
TUV SUD partners with NATRAX to enhance automotive testing in India
What does it signify? TÜV SÜD, a subsidiary of the TÜV SÜD Group, is a leading company specialising in certification, testing, auditing, ...
TÜV SÜD Similar Companies
Bundesministerium für Inneres (BMI)
Das Bundesministerium für Inneres (BMI) ist die Sicherheitsbehörde III. Instanz. Leiter ist der Bundesminister für Inneres, derzeit Mag. Gerhard Karner. Das BMI ist zuständig für das Sicherheitswesen, die Staatsgrenzen und die Organisation des Dienstbetriebs der Bundespolizei. Personenstandsan
TÜV Rheinland Group
Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and certify products, plants, proc
DNV
DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100 countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions. Whether assessing a new ship design,
Belgische federale politie
Belgische federale politie Alle informatie over deze publieke onderneming is terug te vinden op http://www.fedpol.be Het Belgische politielandschap wordt gevormd door een geïntegreerde politie met een lokale en een federale component. De federale politie verzorgt de gespecialiseerde steun aan
Pakistan Red Crescent Society (PRCS)
To be the leading humanitarian organization of Pakistan, which is dynamic, self-reliant and committed to preventing and alleviating human sufferings at the national and international level, while acting in compliance with fundamental principles and humanitarian values of the Red Cross and Red Cresce
DEKRA
DEKRA has been active in the field of safety for almost 100 years. Founded in 1925 in Berlin as Deutscher Kraftfahrzeug-Überwachungs-Verein e.V., it is today one of the world’s leading expert organizations. DEKRA SE is a subsidiary of DEKRA e.V. and manages the Group’s operating business. In 2022,
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
TÜV SÜD CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, TÜV SÜD has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, TÜV SÜD has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and capitalize on technological developments. We specialize in testing, certification, auditing, and advisory services for different industries. Since 1866, we have remained committed to our purpose of enabling progress by protecting people, the environment, and assets from technology related risks. Innovation brings sweeping changes and impacts our work and live in countless ways. At TÜV SÜD, we are dedicated to being a part of that progress. By anticipating technological developments and facilitating change, we inspire trust. Going beyond regulatory compliance, we inspire trust in a physical and digital world to create a safer and more sustainable future. We do not just dream about the future; we actively shape it. Through more than 28,000 employees across over 1,000 locations, we add value to customers and partners by enabling market access and managing risks. We never stop challenging ourselves for the safety of people and society as a whole. We breathe technology, we strive for professional excellence, and we leave a mark. #FutureInYourHands #AddValue #InspireTrust Further information is available at www.tuvsud.com TÜV SÜD AG: Board of Management: Johannes Bussmann (Chairman) Ishan Palit Imprint: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/imprint Data privacy: https://www.tuvsud.com/en/privacy-statement.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
