Turkish Technic Company Cyber Security Posture

https://turkishtechnic.com

Turkish Technic (IATP: TKT), an association of Turkish Airlines group companies (Istanbul Stock Exchange: THYAO), is one of the world’s leading aviation services providers, where comprehensive maintenance, repair, overhaul, modification and reconfiguration services are performed with a highly qualified workforce of 8500 staff within Istanbul Ataturk Airport, Sabiha Gokcen Airport and new Istanbul Airport facilities on two separate continents. Aside from its engineering and maintenance activities, Turkish Technic supports aircraft operators and owners globally with encompassing component pooling, design, certification and production services. Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş. (IATP:TKT); Türk Hava Yolları A.O. marka topluluğunun bir parçasıdır. Dünyanın ileri gelen havacılık servis tedarikçilerinden olan marka, müşterilerine 8500 kişilik uzman ekibiyle; kaliteli ve kapsamlı bakım, onarım, modifikasyon ve rekonfigürasyon hizmetleri sunmaktadır. Ankara ve Aydın’da bakım hangarları bulunan Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş., operasyonlarını İstanbul’da Atatürk Havalimanı ve Sabiha Gökçen Havalimanı tesisleri olmak üzere iki kıtada yürütmekte; mühendislik ve bakım faaliyetlerinin yanı sıra komponent bakım - yedek desteği, dizayn, sertifikasyon ve üretim alanlarında birçok uluslararası havayolu şirketine hizmet vermektedir.

Turkish Technic Company Details

Linkedin ID:

turkish-technic

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

0

NAICS:

481

Industry Type:

Airlines and Aviation

Homepage:

https://turkishtechnic.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

TUR_2176519

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreTurkish Technic Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreTurkish Technic Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Turkish Technic Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Turkish Technic Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Turkish Technic Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Turkish Technic (IATP: TKT), an association of Turkish Airlines group companies (Istanbul Stock Exchange: THYAO), is one of the world’s leading aviation services providers, where comprehensive maintenance, repair, overhaul, modification and reconfiguration services are performed with a highly qualified workforce of 8500 staff within Istanbul Ataturk Airport, Sabiha Gokcen Airport and new Istanbul Airport facilities on two separate continents. Aside from its engineering and maintenance activities, Turkish Technic supports aircraft operators and owners globally with encompassing component pooling, design, certification and production services. Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş. (IATP:TKT); Türk Hava Yolları A.O. marka topluluğunun bir parçasıdır. Dünyanın ileri gelen havacılık servis tedarikçilerinden olan marka, müşterilerine 8500 kişilik uzman ekibiyle; kaliteli ve kapsamlı bakım, onarım, modifikasyon ve rekonfigürasyon hizmetleri sunmaktadır. Ankara ve Aydın’da bakım hangarları bulunan Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş., operasyonlarını İstanbul’da Atatürk Havalimanı ve Sabiha Gökçen Havalimanı tesisleri olmak üzere iki kıtada yürütmekte; mühendislik ve bakım faaliyetlerinin yanı sıra komponent bakım - yedek desteği, dizayn, sertifikasyon ve üretim alanlarında birçok uluslararası havayolu şirketine hizmet vermektedir.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=turkish-technic' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Turkish Technic Cyber Security News

2025-01-18T08:00:00.000Z
Why Saudi Arabia is so keen on the Turkish KAAN

With Saudi Arabia previously keen on acquiring F-35 fighter jets from the United States, what has steered Riyadh toward Turkish technology?

2025-03-13T07:00:00.000Z
Türkiye boosts defenses with new cybersecurity law | Daily Sabah

A cybersecurity bill was passed by the Turkish Parliament on Wednesday, paving the way for better control of cyberspace.

2025-05-23T07:00:00.000Z
India to discuss with security agencies IndiGo's Turkish Airlines partnership

Rival Air India has lobbied Indian officials to halt IndiGo's leasing tie-up with Turkish Airlines, citing business impact as well as security ...

2025-03-13T07:00:00.000Z
Ukraine's Zelenskiy says Turkey is a partner in security guarantees

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Thursday that Ukraine saw Turkey as a partner in security guarantees for his country, and added that ...

2025-02-17T02:29:29.000Z
ZainTECH, Fortinet Strengthen Enterprise Cybersecurity in Middle East

ZainTECH, the regional integrated digital solutions provider of Zain Group, and Fortinet have entered a strategic partnership to deliver advanced ...

2024-12-11T08:00:00.000Z
Turkish electronic toll app (HGS) hacked: Users threatened with offensive messages

Users reported receiving offensive messages and threats demanding cryptocurrency payments. Following the incident, the National Post and ...

2025-01-30T10:31:12.000Z
Priorities for the international agenda of EU’s digital policy in the 2024-2029 mandate

To counter malicious activities in the digital sphere, the EU should strengthen its policies to combat cyberattacks, disinformation, and state-sponsored ...

2025-04-14T07:00:00.000Z
AA Technology inks strategic deal with cybersecurity firm Imperum

With 105 years of history, Anadolu Agency (AA) takes a leading role in media technologies and cybersecurity through its newly established ...

2025-05-09T07:00:00.000Z
Indo-Pak tensions: Sitharaman to chair meet on cyber security readiness of banks, financial institutions

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman will preside over a high-level review meeting on Friday (May 9) evening to assess the cyber security ...

similarCompanies

Turkish Technic Similar Companies

Singapore Airlines

Welcome aboard Singapore Airlines on LinkedIn. Discover travel inspirations, business travel tips, cultural insights, our latest updates, and more. Singapore Airlines is a global company dedicated to providing air transportation services of the highest quality and to maximising returns for the ben

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolíneas Argentinas es la compañía líder en el mercado aerocomercial argentino y referente en la región desde 1950. Su flota de 84 aviones alcanza 38 destinos en Argentina y otros 22 a nivel regional e internacional. Con la reciente incorporación de 2 aeronaves de cargas, la compañía expan

Servisair

Servisair is a leading global provider of aviation ground services delivering an integrated range of handling solutions across 128 locations. We form part of the Derichebourg Group, which also has divisions in Corporate and Environmental Services, collectively employing 47,000 staff throughout 30

avianca

!BIenvenido al sitio oficial! Avianca es la primera aerolínea comercial fundada en las Américas y la segunda en el mundo. Enfocados en alcanzar la excelencia y eficiencia operacional, se dio marcha a una profunda reorganización de los procesos, la cual ha estado acompañada de la modernización

easyJet

We’re on a mission to make low-cost travel easy. Whatever your role, you’ll connect millions of people to what they love using Europe’s best airline network, great value fares, and friendly service. And to help us get there we’ll give you everything you need to make a personal impact on our growing

Lufthansa

Lufthansa is one of the world's largest and most prestigious airlines. With hubs in Frankfurt and Munich, we currently fly to 211 destinations in 74 countries. As an industry innovator, we have long been committed to environmental care and sustainability, operating one of the most technologically-

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Turkish Technic CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Turkish Technic has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Turkish Technic has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Turkish Technic (IATP: TKT), an association of Turkish Airlines group companies (Istanbul Stock Exchange: THYAO), is one of the world’s leading aviation services providers, where comprehensive maintenance, repair, overhaul, modification and reconfiguration services are performed with a highly qualified workforce of 8500 staff within Istanbul Ataturk Airport, Sabiha Gokcen Airport and new Istanbul Airport facilities on two separate continents. Aside from its engineering and maintenance activities, Turkish Technic supports aircraft operators and owners globally with encompassing component pooling, design, certification and production services. Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş. (IATP:TKT); Türk Hava Yolları A.O. marka topluluğunun bir parçasıdır. Dünyanın ileri gelen havacılık servis tedarikçilerinden olan marka, müşterilerine 8500 kişilik uzman ekibiyle; kaliteli ve kapsamlı bakım, onarım, modifikasyon ve rekonfigürasyon hizmetleri sunmaktadır. Ankara ve Aydın’da bakım hangarları bulunan Türk Hava Yolları Teknik A.Ş., operasyonlarını İstanbul’da Atatürk Havalimanı ve Sabiha Gökçen Havalimanı tesisleri olmak üzere iki kıtada yürütmekte; mühendislik ve bakım faaliyetlerinin yanı sıra komponent bakım - yedek desteği, dizayn, sertifikasyon ve üretim alanlarında birçok uluslararası havayolu şirketine hizmet vermektedir..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge