TU Delft Company Cyber Security Posture
tudelft.nlDe TU Delft wil een compleet en hoogwaardig spectrum aan disciplines, onderzoek en opleidingen, blijven bieden op het gebied van de ingenieurswetenschappen met instandhouding van onze unieke faciliteiten. Daarmee wil de TU Delft een technische universiteit met een vooraanstaande wereldwijde reputatie blijven, die door haar peers als world leading wordt gezien. Wij willen een broedplaats zijn en blijven voor grensverleggende technisch-wetenschappelijke antwoorden op de grote maatschappelijke vraagstukken van onze tijd. De TU Delft wil een universiteit zijn die bedrijven waarderen vanwege de uitstekende ingenieurs (MSc en PhD) en als innovatieve samenwerkingspartner op basis van onze hoogwaardige kennis die via nuttigheidsgedreven vragen is verkregen; een universiteit van waaruit nieuwe bedrijvigheid opbloeit en waarvan het onderwijs en onderzoek een belangrijke bijdrage leveren aan een competitieve economie. Wij willen een universiteit zijn waar wetenschappers en studenten werken en denken vanuit inter- en multidisciplinariteit en waar de combinatie van science, design en engineering de dominante invalshoek is in onderwijs en onderzoek. De TU Delft wil een inspirerend en genderbewust instituut blijven waar vanuit de hele wereld de beste wetenschappers en slimste studenten naar toe komen om hun talenten te ontplooien. De TU Delft heeft het meest complete spectrum aan ingenieurswetenschappen in Nederland. Wij leiden ongeveer de helft van de studenten bèta en techniek op. Bijna 100% van de in Delft opgeleide ingenieurs vindt binnen één jaar na afronding van de studie een baan. De TU Delft streeft naar behoud van deze posities.
TU Delft Company Details
tudelft
10393 employees
326140
none
Onderzoeksdiensten
tudelft.nl
73
TU _2858707
In-progress
TU Delft Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
TU Delft Global Score.png)
TU Delft Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
TU Delft Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
TU Delft Company Subsidiaries
De TU Delft wil een compleet en hoogwaardig spectrum aan disciplines, onderzoek en opleidingen, blijven bieden op het gebied van de ingenieurswetenschappen met instandhouding van onze unieke faciliteiten. Daarmee wil de TU Delft een technische universiteit met een vooraanstaande wereldwijde reputatie blijven, die door haar peers als world leading wordt gezien. Wij willen een broedplaats zijn en blijven voor grensverleggende technisch-wetenschappelijke antwoorden op de grote maatschappelijke vraagstukken van onze tijd. De TU Delft wil een universiteit zijn die bedrijven waarderen vanwege de uitstekende ingenieurs (MSc en PhD) en als innovatieve samenwerkingspartner op basis van onze hoogwaardige kennis die via nuttigheidsgedreven vragen is verkregen; een universiteit van waaruit nieuwe bedrijvigheid opbloeit en waarvan het onderwijs en onderzoek een belangrijke bijdrage leveren aan een competitieve economie. Wij willen een universiteit zijn waar wetenschappers en studenten werken en denken vanuit inter- en multidisciplinariteit en waar de combinatie van science, design en engineering de dominante invalshoek is in onderwijs en onderzoek. De TU Delft wil een inspirerend en genderbewust instituut blijven waar vanuit de hele wereld de beste wetenschappers en slimste studenten naar toe komen om hun talenten te ontplooien. De TU Delft heeft het meest complete spectrum aan ingenieurswetenschappen in Nederland. Wij leiden ongeveer de helft van de studenten bèta en techniek op. Bijna 100% van de in Delft opgeleide ingenieurs vindt binnen één jaar na afronding van de studie een baan. De TU Delft streeft naar behoud van deze posities.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
TU Delft Cyber Security News
TU Delft CTF 2024: Hundreds of Hackers Join Largest Dutch Cybersecurity Competition
The TU Delft CTF Team consists of bachelor-, master- and PhD-studenten who gather weekly to improve their hacking skills and compete together.
Alexios Voulimeneas Wins Prestigious Award for Cybersecurity Research
KU Leuven won the Distinguished Paper Award with Artifact at the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2024).
Overview of Machine Learning Algorithms Used In Hardware Security (TU Delft)
This survey, as one of the early attempts, presents the usage of machine learning in hardware security in a full and organized manner.
Security & Privacy Symposium
During the symposium, employees and students can listen to several interesting speakers who are experts in the field of information security and privacy.
New cybersecurity incubation program for startups strengthens digital security and innovation
These programs provide a unique opportunity for startups to develop and scale their cybersecurity solutions, with the goal of enhancing digital security.
NWO Grant Cybersecurity for digital resilience for Savvas Zannettou and Carlos Hernandez Ganan
In a digital age where our lives increasingly unfold online, safeguarding individuals from abuse and cyber threats is more critical than ever.
Jochem van de Laarschot: Making a societal impact with cybersecurity
From a young age, Jochem van de Laarschot is fascinated by technology: taking things apart, discovering how they work, and learning from it all.
Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant: ‘Hackers at TU/e had login credentials’
The hackers who attacked Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) had access to the login credentials of a student and a staff member, ...
Interview Eveline Vreede with Digitaal Veilig Den Haag
Eveline Vreede is the Managing Director of our Safety & Security Institute. She is responsible for collaborations, programs and the ...
TU Delft Similar Companies
Universiteit Utrecht
We werken aan een betere wereld. Dat doen we door complexe vraagstukken te onderzoeken over de grenzen van disciplines heen. We verbinden denkers aan doeners, zodat nieuwe inzichten toegepast worden. We geven studenten de ruimte om zich te ontwikkelen. Zo leveren we substantiële bijdragen aan de sam
Universiteit van Amsterdam
The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inseparable link between the unive
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
TU Delft CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, TU Delft has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, TU Delft has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as De TU Delft wil een compleet en hoogwaardig spectrum aan disciplines, onderzoek en opleidingen, blijven bieden op het gebied van de ingenieurswetenschappen met instandhouding van onze unieke faciliteiten. Daarmee wil de TU Delft een technische universiteit met een vooraanstaande wereldwijde reputatie blijven, die door haar peers als world leading wordt gezien. Wij willen een broedplaats zijn en blijven voor grensverleggende technisch-wetenschappelijke antwoorden op de grote maatschappelijke vraagstukken van onze tijd. De TU Delft wil een universiteit zijn die bedrijven waarderen vanwege de uitstekende ingenieurs (MSc en PhD) en als innovatieve samenwerkingspartner op basis van onze hoogwaardige kennis die via nuttigheidsgedreven vragen is verkregen; een universiteit van waaruit nieuwe bedrijvigheid opbloeit en waarvan het onderwijs en onderzoek een belangrijke bijdrage leveren aan een competitieve economie. Wij willen een universiteit zijn waar wetenschappers en studenten werken en denken vanuit inter- en multidisciplinariteit en waar de combinatie van science, design en engineering de dominante invalshoek is in onderwijs en onderzoek. De TU Delft wil een inspirerend en genderbewust instituut blijven waar vanuit de hele wereld de beste wetenschappers en slimste studenten naar toe komen om hun talenten te ontplooien. De TU Delft heeft het meest complete spectrum aan ingenieurswetenschappen in Nederland. Wij leiden ongeveer de helft van de studenten bèta en techniek op. Bijna 100% van de in Delft opgeleide ingenieurs vindt binnen één jaar na afronding van de studie een baan. De TU Delft streeft naar behoud van deze posities..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
