Comparison Overview

Travel + Leisure Co.

VS

Taj Hotels

Travel + Leisure Co.

6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.travelandleisureco.com

Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a combined 270+ resorts worldwide, offering quality, flexibility, and value to more than 800,000 timeshare owners. Through its Travel and Membership business line, the company unlocks even more travel inspiration and opportunities via its signature subscription travel club, Travel + Leisure GO, and pioneering timeshare exchange network, RCI. With hospitality and responsible tourism at its heart, the company’s 19,000+ dedicated associates around the globe help the company achieve its mission to put the world on vacation.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 14,631
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Taj Hotels

9th Floor, Express Towers,, Mumbai, 400 021, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tajhotels.com

Established in 1903, Taj is The Indian Hotels Company Limited’s (IHCL) iconic brand for the world’s most discerning travellers seeking luxury and authentic experiences. Taj has been rated as India’s Strongest Brand across all sectors for an unprecedented fourth time and also as the World’s Strongest Hotel Brand for the third consecutive year in 2024 by Brand Finance. From landmark city addresses to enchanting jungle safaris, and from idyllic resorts to authentic living Grand Palaces, each Taj hotel offers an unrivalled fusion of warm Indian hospitality, world-class service and modern luxury. Taj's unique portfolio comprises hotels across India, North America, United Kingdom, Africa, Middle East, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 24,292
Subsidiaries: 68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelleisureco.jpeg
Travel + Leisure Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taj-hotels.jpeg
Taj Hotels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Travel + Leisure Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Taj Hotels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taj Hotels in 2026.

Incident History — Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Taj Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taj Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelleisureco.jpeg
Travel + Leisure Co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taj-hotels.jpeg
Taj Hotels
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized AI Tool Usage, No-Code AI Agents, Third-Party AI Service Integration, Misconfigured Cloud Access (e.g., AWS), Zero-Click AI Exploits (e.g., 'Shadow Escape')
Motivation: Productivity Gains, Task Automation, Competitive Edge, Lack of Awareness About Risks, Financial Gain (for Cybercriminals)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Intellectual Property Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Taj Hotels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Travel + Leisure Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Taj Hotels company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Taj Hotels company and Travel + Leisure Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Taj Hotels company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Taj Hotels company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Taj Hotels company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. company nor Taj Hotels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Taj Hotels company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Travel + Leisure Co. company.

Taj Hotels company employs more people globally than Travel + Leisure Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Taj Hotels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References