Comparison Overview

Travel + Leisure Co.

VS

Accor

Travel + Leisure Co.

6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.travelandleisureco.com

Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a combined 270+ resorts worldwide, offering quality, flexibility, and value to more than 800,000 timeshare owners. Through its Travel and Membership business line, the company unlocks even more travel inspiration and opportunities via its signature subscription travel club, Travel + Leisure GO, and pioneering timeshare exchange network, RCI. With hospitality and responsible tourism at its heart, the company’s 19,000+ dedicated associates around the globe help the company achieve its mission to put the world on vacation.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 14,631
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Accor

82 rue Henri Farman, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Paris Region, FR, 92130
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://www.group.accor.com

We are Accor We are more than 290,000 hospitality experts placing people at the heart of what we do, creating emotion for our guests, and nurturing passion for service and achievement beyond limits. Building on the strength of our teams and of our fully integrated ecosystem of leading brands, personalized services & expert solutions, we break new ground to reimagine hospitality and inspire new ways to experience the world. We are dedicated to suit all desires and needs, and reinvent the guest experience every day with our 45 hotel brands across all segments- 5,600 properties around the world from luxury five-star palaces to smart economy hotels, exquisite residences to full-service resorts. Because we take care of millions of guests and each of our hotels is a world in itself, where every action counts. We strive to make positive impact both locally and globally, to ensure hospitality benefits not only the few, but all.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 101,371
Subsidiaries: 91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelleisureco.jpeg
Travel + Leisure Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accor.jpeg
Accor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Travel + Leisure Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Accor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accor in 2026.

Incident History — Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Accor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelleisureco.jpeg
Travel + Leisure Co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accor.jpeg
Accor
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Accor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Travel + Leisure Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Accor company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Accor company and Travel + Leisure Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Accor company nor Travel + Leisure Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Accor company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Travel + Leisure Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Accor company nor Travel + Leisure Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. company nor Accor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Accor company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Travel + Leisure Co. company.

Accor company employs more people globally than Travel + Leisure Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Travel + Leisure Co. nor Accor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References