Comparison Overview

Transport for London

VS

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

Transport for London

5 Endeavour Square, Westfield Avenue,, London , E20 1JN, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Every day, we help millions of people to make journeys across London: By Tube, bus, tram, car, bike – and more. People don’t associate us with journeys by river, on foot or via the air, but we help with that, too. Getting people to where they need to go has been our business for over 100 years, and it shows. We’re leaders in our field, and no other city’s transport system is quite as recognisable: Red buses, black taxis, Tube trains and roundels have become icons in their own right. Our main job is to keep the city moving, working and growing but to do that, we have to listen. Constant improvements across the network are fuelled by feedback and comments from customers, as well as work within communities, representative groups, businesses and other London transport stakeholders. But our progress also depends on technology and data. With the future at our fingertips, we’ve already used it to revolutionise travel payments (think Oyster and contactless payment cards), and improved travel information. Tech and data is essential, not just to our future, but to others’: third parties use our data to power apps and services vital to customer journeys. So what’s next? As well as continuing to deliver Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan’s strategy and commitments on transport, our programme of capital investments is still one of the largest. We launched the Elizabeth line, we’re modernising services and stations and making travel safer for all.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,421
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

19, avenue de la Paix, Geneva, Geneva, CH, 1202
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1863, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people affected by conflict and armed violence and to promote the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its mandate stems essentially from the Geneva Conventions of 1949. It takes action in response to emergencies and promotes respect for international humanitarian law and its implementation in national law. We work closely with National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and with their International Federation to ensure a concerted, rational and rapid humanitarian response to the needs of the victims of armed conflict or any other situation of internal violence. Find out more about the ICRC by visiting the following links: Where we work http://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work Working for the ICRC https://careers.icrc.org/ https://www.icrc.org/en/join-icrc-and-help-protect-lives-and-dignity Current Opportunities https://bit.ly/2GuHdZR

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,847
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transport for London
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for London in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC in 2026.

Incident History — Transport for London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized use of computer systems (TfL), Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business Suite Servers (Oracle)
Motivation: Unclear (potentially disruption or data theft for TfL), Financial gain / extortion (Oracle)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown (likely exploit of exchange vulnerabilities or credential compromise)
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transport for London company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transport for London company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company.

In the current year, International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company and Transport for London company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transport for London company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company nor Transport for London company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Transport for London company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transport for London company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transport for London company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company.

Transport for London company employs more people globally than International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transport for London nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H