Comparison Overview

State Bar of Michigan

VS

New York City Bar Association

State Bar of Michigan

306 Townsend St., Lansing, MI, 48933, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michbar.org

The State Bar shall aid in promoting improvements in the administration of justice and advancements in jurisprudence, in improving relations between the legal profession and the public, and in promoting the interest of the legal profession in this State. "No organization of lawyers can long survive which has not for its primary object the protection of the public."​ Roberts P. Hudson

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

New York City Bar Association

42 W 44th St, New York, 10036, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 650 and 699
http://www.nycbar.org

The New York City Bar Association (www.nycbar.org) is a voluntary organization with 24,000 members. Since its founding in 1870, the City Bar has been dedicated to maintaining the high ethical standards of the legal profession, promoting reform of the law and providing service to the profession and the public. The City Bar's 150 Committees issue hundreds of reports and present hundreds of events annually. The Legal Referral Service matches vetted lawyers with clients. The City Bar Center for CLE provides continuing legal education for lawyers. The City Bar Justice Center provides pro bono legal services to the disadvantaged. Protecting the public’s welfare remains one of the Association’s highest priorities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 379
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-state-bar-of-michigan.jpeg
State Bar of Michigan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-bar.jpeg
New York City Bar Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State Bar of Michigan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New York City Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State Bar of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Bar Association in 2026.

Incident History — State Bar of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State Bar of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New York City Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-state-bar-of-michigan.jpeg
State Bar of Michigan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-bar.jpeg
New York City Bar Association
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State Bar of Michigan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York City Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York City Bar Association company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State Bar of Michigan company has not reported any.

In the current year, New York City Bar Association company and State Bar of Michigan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

New York City Bar Association company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while State Bar of Michigan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

New York City Bar Association company has disclosed at least one data breach, while State Bar of Michigan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither New York City Bar Association company nor State Bar of Michigan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State Bar of Michigan company nor New York City Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

New York City Bar Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State Bar of Michigan company.

New York City Bar Association company employs more people globally than State Bar of Michigan company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State Bar of Michigan nor New York City Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References