Comparison Overview

The Records Company

VS

Tanenholz & Marr

The Records Company

221 High St, Hamilton, 45011, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://therecordsco.com/

At The Records Company, we provide boutique-level records retrieval services tailored to the needs of law firms, insurance companies, healthcare providers, and third-party administrators. Our cutting-edge technology, combined with personalized service, ensures seamless access to medical records, insurance liens, and more. We focus on efficiency, compliance, and confidentiality, saving clients valuable time and money by streamlining complex processes. With our custom-designed system, records can be accessed securely online or delivered via mail, meeting the highest standards of privacy. Recognized in Forbes, Entrepreneur, and Fast Company, we specialize in helping businesses stay ahead by reducing operational overhead and improving productivity. Let us handle the details, so you can focus on what matters most—your clients and operations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tanenholz & Marr

11200 Rockville Pike, Suite 235, Rockville, MD, US, 20852
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
http://tanenholzmarr.com

Tanenholz & Marr is a Washington, D.C. based law firm specializing in all aspects of discovery, from initial consultation to the end-to-end management of large-scale document reviews. With years of big-firm litigation experience, Tanenholz & Marr understands that well-planned and high quality document review can both minimize litigation costs and maximize litigation efficiencies. Providing flexible teams of skilled contract attorneys led by experienced senior associates, Tanenholz & Marr is uniquely equipped to manage your discovery needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-records-company.jpeg
The Records Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tanenholz-marr.jpeg
Tanenholz & Marr
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Records Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tanenholz & Marr
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Records Company in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tanenholz & Marr in 2026.

Incident History — The Records Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Records Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tanenholz & Marr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tanenholz & Marr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-records-company.jpeg
The Records Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tanenholz-marr.jpeg
Tanenholz & Marr
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tanenholz & Marr company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Records Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tanenholz & Marr company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Records Company company.

In the current year, Tanenholz & Marr company and The Records Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr company nor The Records Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr company nor The Records Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr company nor The Records Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Records Company company nor Tanenholz & Marr company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Records Company company nor Tanenholz & Marr company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Records Company company employs more people globally than Tanenholz & Marr company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Records Company nor Tanenholz & Marr holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References