Comparison Overview

中国人民保险 PICC

VS

Marsh McLennan Agency

中国人民保险 PICC

清华西路28号, 海淀区, 100084, CN
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Global 500 (2014) published by the Fortune magazine. The Company is an investment holding company. The Company operates its property and casualty insurance business through PICC Property and Casualty Company.The Company operates its life and health insurance businesses through PICC Life Insurance Company and PICC Health Insurance Company , The Company centrally and professionally manages most of its insurance assets through PICC Asset Management Company and PICC Investment Holding which is a professional investment company specializing in real estate investments. The Company also carries out non-transactional businesses such as equity and debt investments in insurance and non-insurance capital within and outside the Group through PICC Capital Investment Management Company.The Company has also made strategic investments in non-insurance financial businesses such as banking and trust.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 7,623
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Marsh McLennan Agency, a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), is a leading provider of business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions across the US and Canada. Marsh is a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $24 billion and more than 90,000 colleagues, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. For more information about Marsh McLennan Agency, visit marshmma.com.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,372
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
中国人民保险 PICC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marsh McLennan Agency
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中国人民保险 PICC in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2026.

Incident History — 中国人民保险 PICC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中国人民保险 PICC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

中国人民保险 PICC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas 中国人民保险 PICC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marsh McLennan Agency company and 中国人民保险 PICC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor 中国人民保险 PICC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has disclosed at least one data breach, while 中国人民保险 PICC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor 中国人民保险 PICC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marsh McLennan Agency company employs more people globally than 中国人民保险 PICC company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.