Comparison Overview

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

VS

Kenvue

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.elcompanies.com

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in approximately 150 countries and territories under brand names including: Estée Lauder, Aramis, Clinique, Lab Series, Origins, M·A·C, La Mer, Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Aveda, Jo Malone London, Bumble and bumble, Darphin Paris, TOM FORD, Smashbox, AERIN Beauty, Le Labo, Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, GLAMGLOW, KILIAN PARIS, Too Faced, Dr.Jart+, the DECIEM family of brands, including The Ordinary and NIOD, and BALMAIN Beauty. To explore our current job openings, go to www.elcompanies.com

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 52,420
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Kenvue

Summit, New Jersey, US, 07901
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
https://www.kenvue.com

Kenvue is the world’s largest pure-play consumer health company by revenue. Built on more than a century of heritage and propelled forward by science, our iconic brands — including Aveeno®, BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages, Johnson’s®, Listerine®, Neutrogena®, Tylenol® and Zyrtec® — are recommended by health care professionals and can be trusted by consumers who use our products to improve their daily lives. Our team members share a digital-first mindset, with an approach to innovation grounded in deep human insights and work every day to earn a place for our products in consumers’ hearts and homes. At Kenvue, we believe everyday care can not only make people well; it can make them whole. Beware of recruitment scams: https://www.kenvue.com/media/recruitment-scams-alert

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 19,168
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kenvue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 66.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenvue in 2026.

Incident History — The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kenvue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenvue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882, CVE-2025-21884), Unauthenticated HTTP Requests, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware Extortion)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kenvue company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kenvue company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than Kenvue company.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Kenvue company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Kenvue company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Kenvue company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kenvue company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company employs more people globally than Kenvue company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. nor Kenvue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References