Comparison Overview

Texas A&M University

VS

University of Pittsburgh

Texas A&M University

805 Rudder Tower, College Station, TX, US, 77843
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849

Texas A&M University has a proud history that stretches back to 1876 when The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas became the first public institution of higher learning in the state of Texas. Nestled in the heart of the Houston-Dallas-Austin triangle, Texas A&M University at College Station is the state's largest university, with nearly 77,000 students calling Aggieland home, and another 5,200 Aggies are studying at branch campuses in Galveston, Texas, and Doha, Qatar. Texas A&M's designation as a land-, sea-, and space-grant institution reflects the superior quality and diverse range of research and innovation occurring on campus daily. Texas A&M boasts a strong military tradition, having contributed men and women in uniform to every armed conflict since the Spanish-American War. More Aggies commission as officers into the U.S. Armed Forces than any other school outside of the U.S. military academies every year. Student-athletes represent Texas A&M across 18 sports within the Southeastern Conference. Additionally, the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum is located on Texas A&M's campus, as is the President and First Lady’s final resting places. Quick to offer a cheery "Howdy!"​ to any visitor, Aggies pride themselves on their hospitality and strive to live out the University's core values of respect, excellence, leadership, loyalty, integrity, and selfless service. To learn more about employment opportunities at Texas A&M, visit https://jobs.tamu.edu/.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,253
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Pittsburgh

4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15260
Last Update: 2026-04-04

The University of Pittsburgh is a top-ranked, public institution in Pennsylvania and a member of the Association of American Universities of leading research universities. With our discoveries, we are recognized as one of the most innovative universities in the world. We invent the paths of the future and forge ahead. Pitt is a member of the Association of American Universities (AAU), which comprises 62 preeminent doctorate-granting research institutions in North America.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 19,281
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-a&m-university.jpeg
Texas A&M University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
University of Pittsburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas A&M University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Pittsburgh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas A&M University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incident History — Texas A&M University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas A&M University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-a&m-university.jpeg
Texas A&M University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
University of Pittsburgh
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Texas A&M University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Pittsburgh company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Texas A&M University company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Pittsburgh company and Texas A&M University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Pittsburgh company nor Texas A&M University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Pittsburgh company nor Texas A&M University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Pittsburgh company nor Texas A&M University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas A&M University company nor University of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Texas A&M University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Pittsburgh company.

Texas A&M University company employs more people globally than University of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas A&M University nor University of Pittsburgh holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H