Comparison Overview

TentBox

VS

Hy-Pro International

TentBox

39 Botley Road, North Baddesley, S052 9AE, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

TentBox was founded in 2016 and is now the UK’s #1 Roof Top Tent brand. We're a British based company on a mission to build an inclusive, fun and happy community of TentBoxers across the world. We are revolutionising adventure by making the outdoors accessible to all. Our aim is to connect like-minded people through our common love for the wild. We're actively looking to partner with like-minded brands and companies internationally so if your company fits our ethos, please get in touch!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hy-Pro International

Arenson Way, Dunstable, LU5 5BN, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Over fifteen years ago Hy-Pro was founded to distribute specialist sports merchandise. Today the company stands as a successful global enterprise and the UK's premier licensed manufacturer in the outdoor sector. All those years ago, the company first set down this path by leveraging its distribution network established in the sports industry to promote a range of merchandise manufactured under license from some of the biggest football clubs in the world. From these beginnings Hy-Pro has grown exponentially into a prominent supplier to all major retailers in the UK with a portfolio that represents a formidable collection of own-brand product, licenses and brands broadly divided into three areas.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hy-pro-international.jpeg
Hy-Pro International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TentBox
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hy-Pro International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TentBox in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hy-Pro International in 2026.

Incident History — TentBox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TentBox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hy-Pro International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hy-Pro International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hy-pro-international.jpeg
Hy-Pro International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TentBox company and Hy-Pro International company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Hy-Pro International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TentBox company.

In the current year, Hy-Pro International company and TentBox company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hy-Pro International company nor TentBox company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hy-Pro International company nor TentBox company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hy-Pro International company nor TentBox company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TentBox company nor Hy-Pro International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hy-Pro International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TentBox company.

TentBox company employs more people globally than Hy-Pro International company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TentBox nor Hy-Pro International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H