TP Company Cyber Security Posture

tp.com

TP is a global digital business services company. Our global scale and local presence allow us to be a force of good in supporting our communities, our clients, and the environment. We deliver the most advanced, digitally-powered business services to help the worldโ€™s best brands streamline their business in meaningful and sustainable ways.

TP Company Details

Linkedin ID:

teleperformance

Employees number:

224328 employees

Number of followers:

2577355.0

NAICS:

none

Industry Type:

Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting

Homepage:

tp.com

IP Addresses:

29

Company ID:

TP_3221123

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreTP Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 200 and 800

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

TP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 200 and 800

TP Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
TeleperformanceBreach100412/2022TEL2251121222Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Teleperformance USA suffered a data breach after an unauthorized party accessed confidential consumer information that was entrusted to the company. The breach compromised the names, addresses and Social Security numbers of about 2,631 victims in Texas alone. TP USA sent data breach letters to all individuals whose information was compromised in the data security incident.

MajorelBreach50207/2023MAJ04524723Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Majorel learned about a security breach in which hackers were able to access secure data. The manufacturer instantly patched up the flaw. A consumer data leak could not be totally stopped, though. According to the organization, all necessary data security precautions have been taken, and they immediately notified the data protection authority in compliance with GDPR. It was discovered that neither bank information nor current login credentials for the Riester online registration had been stolen.

TP Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

TP is a global digital business services company. Our global scale and local presence allow us to be a force of good in supporting our communities, our clients, and the environment. We deliver the most advanced, digitally-powered business services to help the worldโ€™s best brands streamline their business in meaningful and sustainable ways.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=teleperformance' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

TP Cyber Security News

2025-05-15T07:00:00.000Z
GOP lawmakers urge ban of networking vendor TP-Link, citing ties to China

GOP lawmakers urge ban of networking vendor TP-Link, citing ties to China. The Trump administration is facing mounting pressure to formulate aย ...

2025-05-16T07:00:00.000Z
US lawmakers push to ban TP-Link over national security risks, surveillance concerns

A group of U.S. lawmakers and senators has urged Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick to ban the sale of TP-Link equipment in the nation,ย ...

2025-05-16T07:00:00.000Z
TP-Link router ban urged by Republican legislators

"The Commerce Department does not have legal authority to immediately prohibit sales of TP-Link products. But we are confident that anyย ...

2025-05-01T07:00:00.000Z
TP-Link Is Under Investigation for Predatory Pricing. Should You Replace Your Router?

The Justice Department is reportedly looking into whether TP-Link sold routers below cost.

2025-05-23T07:00:00.000Z
States Have a TP-Link Problem

TP-Link is under U.S. investigation for security and antitrust concerns. As Congress targets federal risks, states and localities mustย ...

2024-12-18T08:00:00.000Z
US considers banning TP-Link routers over cybersecurity risks

The U.S. government is considering banning TP-Link routers starting next year if ongoing investigations find that their use in cyberattacksย ...

2024-12-23T08:00:00.000Z
MSSP Market Update: U.S. Eyes Ban of TP-Link Routers

The government is considering banning these networking devices next year. That's according to a Wall Street Journal report.

2025-03-11T07:00:00.000Z
Ballista Botnet Exploits Unpatched TP-Link Vulnerability, Targets Over 6,000 Devices

Ballista botnet exploits TP-Link router flaw CVE-2023-1389, infecting 6000+ devices worldwide and evolving to use TOR.

2024-12-19T08:00:00.000Z
US eyes ban on TP-Link routers amid cybersecurity concerns

US eyes ban on TP-Link routers amid cybersecurity concerns ยท Experts warn that hacked devices can serve as entry points for corporate espionage,ย ...

similarCompanies

TP Similar Companies

TELUS Digital Philippines

TELUS Digital (NYSE & TSX: TIXT) designs, builds, and delivers next-generation digital solutions to enhance the customer experience (CX) for global and disruptive brands. The companyโ€šร„รดs services support the full lifecycle of its clientsโ€šร„รด digital transformation journeys, enabling them to more quic

Sitel Group

Foundeverโ„ข is a global leader in the customer experience (CX) industry. With 170,000 associates across the globe, weโ€™re the team behind the best experiences for +750 of the worldโ€™s leading and digital-first brands. Our innovative CX solutions, technology and expertise are designed to support operati

iEnergizer is a leading Business Process Outsourcing provider (โ€œBPOโ€) of customer management solutions dedicated to delivering performance while actively supporting and advocating our clientโ€™s brand. iEnergizer helps our Partners acquire, support, retain, and grow their markets by providing complete

Grupo Souza Lima

Sempre inovador, o Grupo Souza Lima desenvolve soluโˆšรŸโˆšยตes completas e hโˆšโ‰ bridas, que realmente funcionam, em serviโˆšรŸos de SeguranโˆšรŸa, Limpeza e Facilities. Essas soluโˆšรŸโˆšยตes jโˆšยฐ sโˆšยฃo realidade para clientes Souza Lima e integram colaboradores treinados com tecnologia avanโˆšรŸada para otimizar recursos

Transguard Group

Offering flexible solutions for all of the UAEโ€™s staffing needs since 2001, Transguard Group is the regionโ€™s most trusted expert in security, facilities management, cash services and white-collar staffing, and more. With an annual turnover of AED 2.7 billion in FY23/24, Transguardโ€™s expertise is in

TaskUs

TaskUs is a different breed of BPO. We are a collective of highly capable humans, who understand how to deploy technology and data to best serve your purpose. From Digital CX to Trust & Safety, AI Services, Risk + Response, Consulting, and anything in between, we consider ourselves responsible for p

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

TP CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, TP has faced 2 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as TP is a global digital business services company. Our global scale and local presence allow us to be a force of good in supporting our communities, our clients, and the environment. We deliver the most advanced, digitally-powered business services to help the worldโ€™s best brands streamline their business in meaningful and sustainable ways..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach'].

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge