Comparison Overview

TED Conferences

VS

British Council

TED Conferences

330 Hudson Street, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

TED’s mission is to discover and champion the ideas that will shape tomorrow. Powerful ideas, powerfully presented, can move us to feel something, to think differently, to take action and create a brighter future. TED finds these powerful ideas across disciplines and around the globe, from people who passionately seek a deeper understanding of the world and want to make a difference in it. TED’s spotlight, and its engaged, open-minded audience, help these ideas to create real impact: to shift one person’s perspective, to make a difference within a community or to spark global transformation. Ideas change everything.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15,408
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

British Council

1 Redman Place, Stratford, London, England, GB, SW1A 2BN
Last Update: 2026-04-02

We support peace and prosperity by building connections, understanding and trust between people in the UK and countries worldwide. We uniquely combine the UK’s deep expertise in arts and culture, education and the English language, our global presence and relationships in over 100 countries, our unparalleled access to young people and influencers and our creative sparkle. We work directly with individuals to help them gain the skills, confidence and connections to transform their lives and shape a better world in partnership with the UK. We support them to build networks and explore creative ideas, to learn English, to get a high-quality education and to gain internationally recognised qualifications. For more information, please visit: http://www.britishcouncil.org

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24,041
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ted-conferences.jpeg
TED Conferences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-council.jpeg
British Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TED Conferences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
British Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TED Conferences in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Council in 2026.

Incident History — TED Conferences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TED Conferences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — British Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ted-conferences.jpeg
TED Conferences
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-council.jpeg
British Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TED Conferences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to British Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

British Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TED Conferences company has not reported any.

In the current year, British Council company and TED Conferences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither British Council company nor TED Conferences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

British Council company has disclosed at least one data breach, while TED Conferences company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither British Council company nor TED Conferences company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TED Conferences company nor British Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

British Council company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TED Conferences company.

British Council company employs more people globally than TED Conferences company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TED Conferences nor British Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda 4G03 Pro up to 1.0/1.1/04.03.01.53/192.168.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /bin/httpd. The manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Wikipedia 12.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash the application by submitting oversized input through the search functionality. Attackers can paste a large buffer of repeated characters into the search bar to trigger an application crash.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nodcms contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting requests to admin/user_manipulate and admin/settings/generall endpoints to create users or modify application settings without explicit consent.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

10-Strike LANState 8.8 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in structured exception handling that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting malicious LSM map files. Attackers can create a specially formatted LSM file with a payload in the ObjCaption parameter that overflows the buffer, overwrites the SEH chain, and executes shellcode when the file is opened in the application.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NICO-FTP 3.0.1.19 contains a structured exception handler buffer overflow vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending crafted FTP commands. Attackers can connect to the FTP service and send oversized data in response handlers to overwrite SEH pointers and redirect execution to injected shellcode.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X