Comparison Overview

STFA Construction Group

VS

Kier Group

STFA Construction Group

Yesilvadi Sokak 3, Istanbul, 34752, TR
Last Update: 2026-03-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stfa.com

Official LinkedIn account of STFA Construction Group. STFA maintains a leading role in the construction industry with operations in the Middle East and North Africa. Its international operations to date include significant and high-impact international projects in Libya (1972), Saudi Arabia (1978), Egypt (1981), Iran (1983), Tunisia (1984), Pakistan (1992), Oman and Qatar (2000). STFA has evolved into a total engineering and construction solutions company with independent business units specialising in the construction of marine structures, highways, bridges, tunnels, deep foundations, residential-commercial-industrial buildings, water and sewage treatment plants, urban infrastructure, engineering and construction management services. STFA’s experience and expertise in these areas enable it to provide integrated solutions to the most challenging projects. It is well-positioned to undertake and deliver the most sophisticated projects successfully. Focusing on customers, employees, suppliers, and the community, the company has been recognized for competence based on knowledge, skill, and experience. It promotes quality-safety-environmental management systems and is certified as conforming to ISO standards which entail social responsibility for sustainable development.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 778
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are committed to attracting, retaining and progressing talent within Kier, with a diverse, and resilient workforce that reflects the communities we serve. Follow the pages below to find out even more about what we do and the talented people we have within Kier and our supply chains who are helping us to meet our purpose. Kier Construction: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-construction Kier Transportation: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-transportation Kier Natural Resources, Nuclear & Networks: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-natural-resources-nuclear-networks Kier Property: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-property Kier Places: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kierplaces www.kier.co.uk

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,990
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stfa-construction-group.jpeg
STFA Construction Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-group.jpeg
Kier Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STFA Construction Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kier Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STFA Construction Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incident History — STFA Construction Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STFA Construction Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stfa-construction-group.jpeg
STFA Construction Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-group.jpeg
Kier Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

STFA Construction Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kier Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kier Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to STFA Construction Group company.

In the current year, Kier Group company and STFA Construction Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kier Group company nor STFA Construction Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kier Group company nor STFA Construction Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kier Group company nor STFA Construction Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STFA Construction Group company nor Kier Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kier Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to STFA Construction Group company.

Kier Group company employs more people globally than STFA Construction Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STFA Construction Group nor Kier Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References