Comparison Overview

Starboard

VS

Mondraker

Starboard

TH, 10540
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.star-board.com

Welcome to Starboard, the world's leading water sports brand. For over 30 years, we've been driven by a singular mission: strive to be the best in the world, FOR the world. This vision guides everything we do, from designing innovative, high-quality products to our commitment to sustainability and reducing our environmental footprint. Join us in our quest to redefine the future of water sports, while protecting the oceans and environments we love.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mondraker

C/ Juan de la Cierva, 66, Elche, 03203, ES
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mondraker.com

Based in Alicante Spain in a great cycling atmosphere, at Mondraker we are a performance focused, innovative Mountain Bike brand and first and foremost we are very passionate about bicycles. Since 2001 we think outside the box, design and manufacture the bikes we want to ride with distinctive look and proprietary technologies such as Zero Suspension System, Stealth aluminum construction and unique, original and award winning Forward Geometry. From the groundbreaking Podium Carbon XC race bike, to the World Cup winning Summum Carbon downhill race bike we make exceptional bicycles with incredible world-class performance that live up to its hype.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starboard-innovation-quality.jpeg
Starboard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondraker.jpeg
Mondraker
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Starboard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mondraker
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starboard in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mondraker in 2026.

Incident History — Starboard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starboard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mondraker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mondraker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starboard-innovation-quality.jpeg
Starboard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondraker.jpeg
Mondraker
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mondraker company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Starboard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mondraker company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Starboard company.

In the current year, Mondraker company and Starboard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mondraker company nor Starboard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mondraker company nor Starboard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mondraker company nor Starboard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Starboard company nor Mondraker company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Starboard company nor Mondraker company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mondraker company employs more people globally than Starboard company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Starboard nor Mondraker holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References