Comparison Overview

Sport Dinaco Inc.

VS

Cycling Sports Group UK

Sport Dinaco Inc.

4330 Rue Joseph-Dubreuil, Montreal, H8T, CA
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://sportdinaco.com

In 1973, a young 23-year-old ski enthusiast named Larry Nardone founded his company, SPORT DINACO, in the basement of the family home. The small distribution office quickly became renowned for its quality products, personnel and outstanding personalized service. Close to 50 years later, the company has grown and the products have changed but the cornerstone of the company remains steadfast: PASSION FOR QUALITY. Innovative, high-end products, dedicated personnel and outstanding customer service continue to be the foundation on which thrives. Our Brands: -BLACK+BLUM -CHROME INDUSTRIES -LEKI -LOWA -ROHNER -SEIRUS -VAUDE

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cycling Sports Group UK

Vantage Way, Poole, BH12 4NU, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.cyclingsportsgroup.co.uk/

Cycling Sports Group is proud to present a truly unique and powerful portfolio of cycling brands to the market, continually striving to evolve our business through the very best products and service available today. Formerly known as Hotwheels International, originally a BMX distributor with over three decades of heritage, CSG was officially established in 2009 along with the introduction of American bicycle brand Cannondale joining an already illustrious portfolio including Charge, GT, Mongoose, Fabric and Wethepeople, and an extensive range of accessories designed to enhance your riding experience. Located in Poole, Dorset, our dedicated and passionate team manage every aspect of the business from sales, marketing, accounts, distribution and customer service to support our growing network of retailers throughout the UK.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-dinaco-inc.jpeg
Sport Dinaco Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cycling-sports-group-uk.jpeg
Cycling Sports Group UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sport Dinaco Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cycling Sports Group UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sport Dinaco Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cycling Sports Group UK in 2026.

Incident History — Sport Dinaco Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sport Dinaco Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cycling Sports Group UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cycling Sports Group UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-dinaco-inc.jpeg
Sport Dinaco Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cycling-sports-group-uk.jpeg
Cycling Sports Group UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sport Dinaco Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cycling Sports Group UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cycling Sports Group UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sport Dinaco Inc. company.

In the current year, Cycling Sports Group UK company and Sport Dinaco Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cycling Sports Group UK company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cycling Sports Group UK company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cycling Sports Group UK company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. company nor Cycling Sports Group UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. company nor Cycling Sports Group UK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sport Dinaco Inc. company employs more people globally than Cycling Sports Group UK company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cycling Sports Group UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References