
Straive Company Cyber Security Posture
straive.comWisdom, the ability to apply knowledge to the real world with discernment, is critical for todayโs enterprise. However, wisdom becomes available to the enterprise after the iterative application of knowledge to multiple long-tail experiments. Straive helps clients operationalize the Data โInsights โ Knowledge โ AI value chain. Straiveโs clients extend across industries, including Financial Services, Insurance, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Scientific Research, Information Providers, EdTech, and Logistics We combine data-driven insights with enterprise know-how to create knowledge unique to an enterprise and its specific problems. This "specific knowledgeโ is embedded into digital technology & AIs and operationalized with human experts-in-loop, who facilitate iterative improvements in the technology while navigating the complexity that it canโt yet address.ย With a client base scoping 30 countries worldwide, Straiveโs multi-geographical resource pool of 15000+ experts, is located across the United States, UK & Europe, Singapore, South Africa, India, Philippines, Nicaragua, Canada and Vietnam. In Nov 2023, Straive acquired Gramener, an award-winning, design-led data science company to enhance data, analytics and AI capabilities Straive is an equal opportunity employer. We are committed to celebrating diversity, equity, & inclusion in the workplace. We do not tolerate discrimination & harassment of any kind based on race, color, sex, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, genetic information, pregnancy, or any other protected characteristic as outlined by federal, state, or local laws. Straive makes hiring decisions based solely on qualifications, merit, & business needs at the time.
Straive Company Details
spi-global
11605 employees
252773.0
541
Business Consulting and Services
straive.com
Scan still pending
STR_6069600
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

Straive Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Straive Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|
Straive Company Subsidiaries

Wisdom, the ability to apply knowledge to the real world with discernment, is critical for todayโs enterprise. However, wisdom becomes available to the enterprise after the iterative application of knowledge to multiple long-tail experiments. Straive helps clients operationalize the Data โInsights โ Knowledge โ AI value chain. Straiveโs clients extend across industries, including Financial Services, Insurance, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Scientific Research, Information Providers, EdTech, and Logistics We combine data-driven insights with enterprise know-how to create knowledge unique to an enterprise and its specific problems. This "specific knowledgeโ is embedded into digital technology & AIs and operationalized with human experts-in-loop, who facilitate iterative improvements in the technology while navigating the complexity that it canโt yet address.ย With a client base scoping 30 countries worldwide, Straiveโs multi-geographical resource pool of 15000+ experts, is located across the United States, UK & Europe, Singapore, South Africa, India, Philippines, Nicaragua, Canada and Vietnam. In Nov 2023, Straive acquired Gramener, an award-winning, design-led data science company to enhance data, analytics and AI capabilities Straive is an equal opportunity employer. We are committed to celebrating diversity, equity, & inclusion in the workplace. We do not tolerate discrimination & harassment of any kind based on race, color, sex, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, genetic information, pregnancy, or any other protected characteristic as outlined by federal, state, or local laws. Straive makes hiring decisions based solely on qualifications, merit, & business needs at the time.
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
Straive Cyber Security News
Data governance & cybersecurity insights from Snowflake Summit
Data governance is fast becoming a pillar of enterprise security strategy as organizations confront data sprawl, multicloud complexity andย ...
Why Robot Cybersecurity Needs an Upgrade | Founder Shield
Robot cybersecurity risks. Control engineers in industrial environments increasingly grapple with sophisticated cyber threats targeting roboticย ...
UK Organizations Boosting Cybersecurity Budgets
UK organizations are prioritizing cybersecurity with a projected 31% budget increase in the next 12 months, according to Infosecurity Europe.
How to start your cybersecurity career: Expert tips and guidance
This article provides expert advice to help you navigate the early stages of your cybersecurity career, offering practical tips and insights.
Liquid C2, Google & Anthropic partner on cloud, cybersecurity, GenAI
Liquid C2 plans to improve its cybersecurity and cloud offerings across the continent while introducing Google Cloud's latest AI, data, collaboration andย ...
Cyber Layoffs, Opportunities, And Trust In The Healthcare Industry
Healthcare organizations are confronting a dual challenge of fortifying cybersecurity defenses and addressing financial constraints, whileย ...
How CFPBโs cybersecurity strategy puts people first as they โstrive for fiveโ
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is concentrating on its people above its technology in its IT modernization and cybersecurity efforts.
Threat actors strive to cause Tax Day headaches
Microsoft observed phishing attacks targeting accounting and tax return preparation firms to deliver the Remcos RAT & compromise networks.
Carmakers Strive to Stay Ahead of Hackers (Published 2021)
The effects of a breach of a car, or fleet, could be devastating. Auto manufacturers and suppliers have aggressive plans, and a lot of firewalls.

Straive Similar Companies

DOMINION GLOBAL
We provide sustainable services and 360 projects. We offer comprehensive solutions in the areas of Industry, Technology and Telecommunications, Energy and Infrastructures. We help our clients in their transition towards more efficient and environmentally friendly business models thanks to our knowl

Applus+
Applus+ is a worldwide leader in the testing, inspection, and certification sector. We are a trusted partner, enhancing the quality and safety of our clientsโ assets and infrastructures while safeguarding their operations and improving their environmental performance. Our innovative approach, techni

Alvarez & Marsal
Alvarez & Marsal is a leading global professional services firm dedicated to helping organizations tackle their most complex business issues, maximize stakeholder value, and deliver sustainable change. Privately held since its founding in 1983, clients select us for our deep expertise and proven a

Guidehouse
Guidehouse is a global consultancy providing advisory, technology, and managed services to the commercial and public sectors. Guidehouse is purpose-built to serve the national security, financial services, healthcare, energy, and infrastructure industries. Disrupting legacy consulting delivery model

Acando
Acando รคr partnern fรถr dig som vill fรถrรคndra din verksamhet. Med lika delar teknisk spetskompetens och insikt i mรคnskliga beteenden och triggers - och sรฅklart ett rรฅgat mรฅtt kreativitet - skapar vi idรฉer, lรถser problem och mobiliserar organisationer till fรถrรคndring. Som medarbetare pรฅ Acando รคr det

ELIS
As the leader in circular services at work, Elis ensures its clients achieve optimal hygiene, well-being and protection โ everywhere, every day, in a sustainable way. We employ 54,000 people locally in 30 countries. We work for public and private organizations of all sizes, in all sectors of activi

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Straive CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Straive has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Straive has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Wisdom, the ability to apply knowledge to the real world with discernment, is critical for todayโs enterprise. However, wisdom becomes available to the enterprise after the iterative application of knowledge to multiple long-tail experiments. Straive helps clients operationalize the Data โInsights โ Knowledge โ AI value chain. Straiveโs clients extend across industries, including Financial Services, Insurance, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Scientific Research, Information Providers, EdTech, and Logistics We combine data-driven insights with enterprise know-how to create knowledge unique to an enterprise and its specific problems. This "specific knowledgeโ is embedded into digital technology & AIs and operationalized with human experts-in-loop, who facilitate iterative improvements in the technology while navigating the complexity that it canโt yet address.ย With a client base scoping 30 countries worldwide, Straiveโs multi-geographical resource pool of 15000+ experts, is located across the United States, UK & Europe, Singapore, South Africa, India, Philippines, Nicaragua, Canada and Vietnam. In Nov 2023, Straive acquired Gramener, an award-winning, design-led data science company to enhance data, analytics and AI capabilities Straive is an equal opportunity employer. We are committed to celebrating diversity, equity, & inclusion in the workplace. We do not tolerate discrimination & harassment of any kind based on race, color, sex, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, genetic information, pregnancy, or any other protected characteristic as outlined by federal, state, or local laws. Straive makes hiring decisions based solely on qualifications, merit, & business needs at the time..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
