Comparison Overview

Sonatrach

VS

ADNOC Group

Sonatrach

Djenane El Malik, Hydra, 16035, DZ
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonatrach.com

Sonatrach (Société Nationale pour la Recherche, la Production, le Transport, la Transformation, et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures s.p.a.) is an Algerian government-owned company formed to exploit the hydrocarbon resources of the country. Its diversified activities cover all aspects of Oil & Gas industry chain. Upstream (E&P), Midstream (Transport) and Downstream (Marketing, Refining and Petchems).

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 45,447
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ADNOC Group

Corniche Road, Abu Dhabi, 898, AE
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adnoc.ae

We are one of the world's leading energy producers, and a primary catalyst for Abu Dhabi’s growth and diversification. We operate across the entire hydrocarbon value chain, through a network of fully-integrated businesses, with interests that range from exploration, production, storage, refining and distribution, to the development of a wide-range of petrochemical products. Since 1971, we have created thousands of jobs, driven the growth of a diverse knowledge-based economy, and played a key role in Abu Dhabi’s global emergence. Today, we continue to look for new and innovative ways to maximize the value of our resources, pioneering those approaches and technologies that will ensure we are able to meet the demands of an ever-changing energy market, and continue to have a positive impact on the Abu Dhabi economy for generations to come.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 49,223
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonatrach.jpeg
Sonatrach
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adnocgroup.jpeg
ADNOC Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sonatrach
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ADNOC Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonatrach in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ADNOC Group in 2026.

Incident History — Sonatrach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonatrach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ADNOC Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADNOC Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonatrach.jpeg
Sonatrach
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adnocgroup.jpeg
ADNOC Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sonatrach company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ADNOC Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ADNOC Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sonatrach company has not reported any.

In the current year, ADNOC Group company and Sonatrach company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ADNOC Group company nor Sonatrach company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ADNOC Group company nor Sonatrach company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

ADNOC Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sonatrach company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sonatrach company nor ADNOC Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ADNOC Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sonatrach company.

ADNOC Group company employs more people globally than Sonatrach company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sonatrach nor ADNOC Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References