Comparison Overview

Siemens Energy

VS

ENGIE

Siemens Energy

Last Update: 2026-03-30
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.siemens-energy.com

Siemens Energy is one of the world’s leading energy technology companies. The company works with its customers and partners on energy systems for the future, thus supporting the transition to a more sustainable world. With its portfolio of products, solutions and services, Siemens Energy covers almost the entire energy value chain – from power generation and transmission to storage. The portfolio includes conventional and renewable energy technology, such as gas and steam turbines, hybrid power plants operated with hydrogen, and power generators and transformers. A majority stake in the wind power subsidiary Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) makes Siemens Energy a global market leader for renewable energies. An estimated one-sixth of the electricity generated worldwide is based on technologies from Siemens Energy. Siemens Energy employs 103,000 people worldwide in more than 90 countries and generated revenue of around €39.1 billion in fiscal year 2025. Siemens Energy is a trademark licensed by Siemens AG

NAICS: 22113
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 52,735
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

ENGIE

1 place Samuel de Champlain, Paris, La défense, 92930, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://www.engie.com/en

What if your next career adventure started with ENGIE? Joining ENGIE means being part of a company at the forefront of the energy transition, committed to accelerating the shift to a carbon-neutral economy. With 98,000 employees across 30 countries, ENGIE's operations cover the entire energy value chain, from production to infrastructures and sales. ENGIE works across a range of complementary areas: renewable electricity and green gas production, flexibility assets (notably batteries), gas and electricity transmission and distribution networks, local energy infrastructures (heating and cooling networks) and energy supply to individuals, local authorities and businesses. #WithENGIE

NAICS: 22113
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 44,927
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens-energy.jpeg
Siemens Energy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engie.jpeg
ENGIE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Siemens Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ENGIE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens Energy in 2026.

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGIE in 2026.

Incident History — Siemens Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ENGIE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGIE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens-energy.jpeg
Siemens Energy
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Default Credentials, Exploited Vulnerabilities, Internet-Exposed Devices
Motivation: Disruption of Critical Infrastructure, Cyber Warfare, Geopolitical Tensions
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploit of MOVEit Transfer vulnerability
Motivation: Financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engie.jpeg
ENGIE
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ENGIE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Siemens Energy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Siemens Energy company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to ENGIE company.

In the current year, ENGIE company and Siemens Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Siemens Energy company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ENGIE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

ENGIE company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Siemens Energy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ENGIE company nor Siemens Energy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Siemens Energy company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ENGIE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ENGIE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Siemens Energy company.

Siemens Energy company employs more people globally than ENGIE company, reflecting its scale as a Renewable Energy Power Generation.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Siemens Energy nor ENGIE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References