Comparison Overview

Shell

VS

Ecopetrol

Shell

York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.shell.com

Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose is to power progress together by working with each other, our customers and our partners. #PoweringProgress

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 185,291
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Ecopetrol

Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, ----, CO
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ecopetrol.com.co

Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Colombia y de la gran parte de la infraestructura del segmento de transporte. A su vez, participa en la venta de energía y distribución de gas. En el panorama internacional, el foco estratégico de Ecopetrol se concentra en las cuencas del continente americano. Tiene operación y participa en proyectos de exploración y producción en Estados Unidos (Cuenca Permian y Golfo de México), Brasil y México. Como parte de la estrategia de sosTECnibilidad, la compañía lidera diferentes iniciativas en aspectos claves como descarbonización, energías renovables, gestión del agua, Desarrollo sostenible del territorio y transformación digital. Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) is the largest company in Colombia and one of the leading integrated energy groups in the American continent, with operations in over eight countries. Its operations span the hydrocarbons value chain (upstream, midstream, downstream), gas distribution, energy transmission, management of real-time systems, road concessions, and telecommunications. As part of its TESG agenda (Technology, Environmental, Social and Governance), the company is leading several initiatives for diversification and decarbonization through, among others, renewables, electrification, natural climate solutions, and hydrogen. All the above, underpinned by innovation and technology as catalyzers of sustainability.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 12,683
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shell.jpeg
Shell
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecopetrol.jpeg
Ecopetrol
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shell
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ecopetrol
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Shell has 56.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecopetrol in 2026.

Incident History — Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shell.jpeg
Shell
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Web Application Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecopetrol.jpeg
Ecopetrol
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ecopetrol company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shell company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ecopetrol company has not reported any.

In the current year, Shell company has reported more cyber incidents than Ecopetrol company.

Neither Ecopetrol company nor Shell company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ecopetrol company nor Shell company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ecopetrol company nor Shell company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Shell company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ecopetrol company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Shell company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ecopetrol company.

Shell company employs more people globally than Ecopetrol company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shell nor Ecopetrol holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References