Comparison Overview

SA Health

VS

Johns Hopkins Medicine

SA Health

Citi Centre Building, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-03-30

Welcome to SA Health. Our vision The best health for South Australians. At SA Health we are committed to protecting and improving the health of all South Australians. We do this by providing leadership in health reform, public health services, health and medical research, policy development and planning, with an increased focus on wellbeing, early intervention and quality care. Our public health services meet the needs of South Australians in metropolitan and regional locations through a network of hospitals and health services. Our mission SA Health will lead and deliver a comprehensive and sustainable health system that aims to ensure healthier, longer and better lives for all South Australians. Our values SA Health is committed to the values of integrity, respect and accountability. We value care, excellence, innovation, creativity, leadership and equity in health care provision and health outcomes. We demonstrate our values in our interactions with others in SA Health, the community and those for whom we care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 8,997
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Johns Hopkins Medicine

600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, 21231, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29

Johns Hopkins Medicine is a governing structure for the University’s School of Medicine and the health system, coordinating their research, teaching, patient care, and related enterprises. The Johns Hopkins Hospital opened in 1889, followed four years later by the university’s School of Medicine, revolutionizing medical practice, teaching, and research in the United States. The hospital is now part of the Johns Hopkins Health System, which includes two other acute-care hospitals and additional integrated health-care delivery components, with a network of primary and specialty care practices throughout Maryland, outpatient care, long-term care, and home care. The Johns Hopkins University opened in 1876 as America’s first research university, founded for the express purpose of expanding knowledge and putting that knowledge to work for the good of humanity. Two Interconnected Institutions: Over the years, the University and Hospital have grown, and—sometimes jointly, sometimes separately—they have created affiliated organizations. The Johns Hopkins Institutions is a collective name for the University and the Johns Hopkins Health System. The Johns Hopkins University includes nine academic and research divisions, and numerous centers, institutes, and affiliated entities. Johns Hopkins Medicine is a governing structure for the University’s School of Medicine and the health system, coordinating their research, teaching, patient care, and related enterprises.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 38,347
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-medicine.jpeg
Johns Hopkins Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SA Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johns Hopkins Medicine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SA Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johns Hopkins Medicine in 2026.

Incident History — SA Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SA Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johns Hopkins Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johns Hopkins Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unintentional Human Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-medicine.jpeg
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Johns Hopkins Medicine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SA Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SA Health and Johns Hopkins Medicine have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Johns Hopkins Medicine company and SA Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SA Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SA Health company nor Johns Hopkins Medicine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SA Health company.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company employs more people globally than SA Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SA Health nor Johns Hopkins Medicine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H