Comparison Overview

SA Health

VS

Fortis Healthcare

SA Health

Citi Centre Building, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-03-30

Welcome to SA Health. Our vision The best health for South Australians. At SA Health we are committed to protecting and improving the health of all South Australians. We do this by providing leadership in health reform, public health services, health and medical research, policy development and planning, with an increased focus on wellbeing, early intervention and quality care. Our public health services meet the needs of South Australians in metropolitan and regional locations through a network of hospitals and health services. Our mission SA Health will lead and deliver a comprehensive and sustainable health system that aims to ensure healthier, longer and better lives for all South Australians. Our values SA Health is committed to the values of integrity, respect and accountability. We value care, excellence, innovation, creativity, leadership and equity in health care provision and health outcomes. We demonstrate our values in our interactions with others in SA Health, the community and those for whom we care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 8,997
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Fortis Healthcare

Tower A, Unitech Business Park, Gurgaon, 122001, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01

Fortis Healthcare Group is a leading integrated healthcare provider operating across the Asia Pacific region. With more than 20,000 employees and growing, Fortis Helathcare is currently present in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong SAR, India, Mauritius, New Zealand, Singapore, Sri Lanka, UAE, and Vietnam. The hallmark of Fortis Healthcare, distinguishing us from our contemporaries, is the 'patient-centricity'​ that you will discern all over: in hospital design, services, programmes and most significantly in the caring approach of our people.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,590
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortis-healthcare.jpeg
Fortis Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SA Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fortis Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SA Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortis Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — SA Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SA Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fortis Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortis Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unintentional Human Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortis-healthcare.jpeg
Fortis Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fortis Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SA Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SA Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fortis Healthcare company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fortis Healthcare company and SA Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fortis Healthcare company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fortis Healthcare company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fortis Healthcare company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SA Health company nor Fortis Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SA Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fortis Healthcare company.

Fortis Healthcare company employs more people globally than SA Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SA Health nor Fortis Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H