Comparison Overview

RWE

VS

Southern California Edison (SCE)

RWE

RWE Platz 1, Essen, 45141, DE
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rwe.com

RWE is leading the way to a clean energy world. With its investment and growth strategy Growing Green, RWE is contributing significantly to the success of the energy transition and the decarbonisation of the energy system. Around 20,000 employees work for the company in almost 30 countries worldwide. RWE is already one of the leading companies in the field of renewable energy. RWE is investing billions of euros in expanding its generation portfolio, in particular in offshore and onshore wind, solar energy and batteries. It is perfectly complemented by its global energy trading. RWE is decarbonising its business in line with the 1.5-degree reduction pathway and will phase out coal by 2030. RWE will be net-zero by 2040. Fully in line with the company’s purpose — Our energy for a sustainable life.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 14,866
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Southern California Edison (SCE)

2244 Walnut Grove Ave., Rosemead, 91770, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sce.com/

As one of the nation’s largest electric utilities, we’re bringing more clean and renewable sources of energy to Southern California. From energy storage to transportation electrification, our employees are working on innovative projects that will help cut emissions and greenhouse gases to provide cleaner air for everyone. We have diverse teams, made up of inventors, doers and problem solvers. The people here at SCE don't just keep the lights on. The mission is so much bigger. We are fueling the kind of innovation that is changing an entire industry, and quite possibly the planet. Follow us on LinkedIn and visit www.edisoncareers.com to learn more about who we are and how we’re working together to create a better tomorrow.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,464
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwe-.jpeg
RWE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sce.jpeg
Southern California Edison (SCE)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RWE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southern California Edison (SCE)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWE in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern California Edison (SCE) in 2026.

Incident History — RWE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southern California Edison (SCE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern California Edison (SCE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwe-.jpeg
RWE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sce.jpeg
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

RWE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Southern California Edison (SCE) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RWE company has not reported any.

In the current year, Southern California Edison (SCE) company and RWE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Southern California Edison (SCE) company nor RWE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while RWE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Southern California Edison (SCE) company nor RWE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RWE company nor Southern California Edison (SCE) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Southern California Edison (SCE) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RWE company.

RWE company employs more people globally than Southern California Edison (SCE) company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RWE nor Southern California Edison (SCE) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References