Comparison Overview

RWE

VS

Correos

RWE

RWE Platz 1, Essen, 45141, DE
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

RWE is leading the way to a clean energy world. With its investment and growth strategy Growing Green, RWE is contributing significantly to the success of the energy transition and the decarbonisation of the energy system. Around 20,000 employees work for the company in almost 30 countries worldwide. RWE is already one of the leading companies in the field of renewable energy. RWE is investing billions of euros in expanding its generation portfolio, in particular in offshore and onshore wind, solar energy and batteries. It is perfectly complemented by its global energy trading. RWE is decarbonising its business in line with the 1.5-degree reduction pathway and will phase out coal by 2030. RWE will be net-zero by 2040. Fully in line with the company’s purpose — Our energy for a sustainable life.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 14,866
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Correos

Calle del Conde de Peñalver, 19, Madrid, 28006, ES
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

Somos la empresa líder en comunicaciones físicas, digitales y de paquetería. Nuestra misión es prestar un servicio integral de calidad, ofreciendo soluciones y servicios en toda la cadena de valor del ecommerce con el objetivo de facilitar la vida a nuestros clientes. Distribuimos más de 5.100 millones de envíos al año y llegamos a 19 millones de hogares y dos millones de empresas. Somos la primera empresa del país por capilaridad y cobertura territorial, con más de 10.000 puntos de acceso a nuestros servicios: 2.200 oficinas multiservicio, 100 unidades de servicios especiales 1.821 unidades de distribución y 7.676 puntos de servicio en el ámbito rural (atención al cliente y/o reparto). Y, sobre todo, somos la empresa con mayor número de personas al servicio de personas. Más de 65.000 profesionales trabajando para que Correos sea cada día una empresa más moderna, eficiente y competitiva.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 13,714
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwe-.jpeg
RWE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correos.jpeg
Correos
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RWE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Correos
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWE in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Correos in 2026.

Incident History — RWE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Correos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Correos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwe-.jpeg
RWE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correos.jpeg
Correos
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

RWE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Correos company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Correos company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RWE company has not reported any.

In the current year, Correos company and RWE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Correos company nor RWE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Correos company has disclosed at least one data breach, while RWE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Correos company nor RWE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RWE company nor Correos company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RWE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Correos company.

RWE company employs more people globally than Correos company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RWE nor Correos holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H