Comparison Overview

Royal BAM Group

VS

COLAS

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, NL, 3981 AZ
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bam.com/

🏗️ Building a sustainable tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around focusing to protect profitability, transforming to strengthen competitive advantage, and expanding for future growth. Join us in making possible by prioritising sustainability in everything we do. 🌍

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,560
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

COLAS

1, Rue du Colonel Pierre Avia, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
https://allinks.click/colas

Colas, a subsidiary of the Bouygues Group, is a major player in the construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure and urban development. Colas covers the entire value chain: from industrial production to service offerings, including construction work. Thanks to its local presence in some fifty countries on five continents 🌍, Colas achieved a consolidated revenue of €15.9 billion in 2024, 59% of which is outside France. With its 64,000 employees 👷‍♀️👷‍♂️, a network of 2,000 operating units comprising 3,500 production units, and nearly 45,000 projects per year, Colas is the trusted partner of its customers. Colas maintains its pioneering, innovative and responsible spirit to connect people and foster the sustainable development of territories 🚀 ♻. Colas shares the four founding values of the Bouygues Group, which form the basis of its corporate culture and the way it operates on a daily basis: • Respect: treat others how you would like to be treated. • Commitment: for us, commitment is about giving your heart and soul. • Pioneering: bold innovation, not blind ambition. • Sharing: at Bouygues, knowledge and experience are meant to be passed on. At Colas, it’s our people who drive our company forward. We strive to develop talent, and we give those who join the company the opportunity to reach their full potential throughout their careers. Because, when you join Colas, we hope you’ll make a career here.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,508
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal BAM Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
COLAS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2026.

Incident History — Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, Data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

COLAS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

COLAS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Royal BAM Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, COLAS company and Royal BAM Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

COLAS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

COLAS company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

COLAS company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group company nor COLAS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

COLAS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Royal BAM Group company.

COLAS company employs more people globally than Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor COLAS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References