Comparison Overview

Royal BAM Group

VS

Bechtel Corporation

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, NL, 3981 AZ
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bam.com/

🏗️ Building a sustainable tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around focusing to protect profitability, transforming to strengthen competitive advantage, and expanding for future growth. Join us in making possible by prioritising sustainability in everything we do. 🌍

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,560
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bechtel Corporation

Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bechtel.com

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives to create a lasting positive impact. Since 1898, we have helped customers complete more than 25,000 projects in 160 countries on all seven continents that have created jobs, grown economies, improved the resiliency of the world's infrastructure, increased access to energy, resources, and vital services, and made the world a safer, cleaner place. Bechtel serves the Energy; Infrastructure; Manufacturing & Technology; Mining & Metals; and Nuclear, Security & Environmental markets. Our services span from initial planning and investment, through start-up and operations. Bechtel has received reports about individuals receiving fraudulent job confirmations and requests for interviews, offers, or solicitations for training via letters, emails, social postings, phone calls, instant messages (including Whatsapp) and texts. If you receive unsolicited job or interview offers or are unsure if the offer you received is fraudulent, contact Bechtel at [email protected]. Please forward the email, phone number, and any other documentation you received.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 32,575
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal BAM Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bechtel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

Bechtel Corporation has 61.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882, CVE-2025-21884), Unauthenticated HTTP Requests, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware Extortion)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Royal BAM Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bechtel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bechtel Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Royal BAM Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bechtel Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Royal BAM Group company.

Bechtel Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor Royal BAM Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Bechtel Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group company nor Bechtel Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Royal BAM Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bechtel Corporation company.

Bechtel Corporation company employs more people globally than Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References