Rodan + Fields Company Cyber Security Posture
rodanandfields.comWe are Rodan + Fields, founded by Stanford-trained dermatologists with a mission to revolutionize skincare for women everywhere. Our products are dermatologist-developed and inspired by Women-Backed Scienceโข, delivering real, visible results. We understand what works for womenโs skin, from acne to the signs of aging, and are dedicated to providing safe, effective solutions that truly work. As the #1 Female Dermatologist-Founded Skincare Brand in the US*, we continue to innovate and grow. With over 12 million customers and more than 15 years of proven results, Rodan + Fields is committed to delivering the best for your skin. We value diversity and inclusivity and are always looking for passionate individuals who want to make a meaningful impact. If youโre driven by science and skincare, and want to help women achieve healthy, glowing skin, weโd love to have you with us. *For more details visit our website
R+F Company Details
rodan-fields
19733 employees
64799.0
339
Manufacturing
rodanandfields.com
Scan still pending
ROD_4827330
In-progress
R+F Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
R+F Global Score.png)
Rodan + Fields Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Rodan + Fields Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Rodan + Fields Company Subsidiaries
We are Rodan + Fields, founded by Stanford-trained dermatologists with a mission to revolutionize skincare for women everywhere. Our products are dermatologist-developed and inspired by Women-Backed Scienceโข, delivering real, visible results. We understand what works for womenโs skin, from acne to the signs of aging, and are dedicated to providing safe, effective solutions that truly work. As the #1 Female Dermatologist-Founded Skincare Brand in the US*, we continue to innovate and grow. With over 12 million customers and more than 15 years of proven results, Rodan + Fields is committed to delivering the best for your skin. We value diversity and inclusivity and are always looking for passionate individuals who want to make a meaningful impact. If youโre driven by science and skincare, and want to help women achieve healthy, glowing skin, weโd love to have you with us. *For more details visit our website
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
R+F Cyber Security News
Rodan and Fields partners with Ulta
Products from the direct-to-consumer skin care company are now available at 150 Ulta stores nationwide and on its website.
More Trouble For Embattled Skincare Firm Rodan + Fields: Its Insurer Is Suing
Rodan + Fields' insurer claims they aren't more financially responsible for court costs or claims involved in class action lawsuits for Lash Boost.
TPG nears deal to take a stake in skin care company Rodan + Fields
Private equity firm TPG Capital is nearing a deal to take a minority stake in skin care brand Rodan + Fields, sources familiar with theย ...
Private Equity Shoves Angry Lenders to the Back of the Line
Private equity owners and aggressive creditors, including gatecrashing hedge funds, have been able to exploit lax legal wording on loan termsย ...
Skin Care Billionaires Rodan And Fields Return To The Teen Acne Market
Dermatologists Katie Rodan and Kathy Fields got their start with acne treatment Proactiv, then moved on to become billionaires viaย ...
Rodan + Fields fires woman dubbed โPool Patrol Paulaโ after alleged assault on black teens at pool
Stephanie Sebby-Strempel, 38, was arrested and jailed Monday after accosting a group of black teens at a Summerville, SC-area pool on Sunday and allegedlyย ...
FTC warns multilevel marketing company sellers about coronavirus health and earnings claims
The FTC has sent warning letters to ten multilevel marketing companies, including doTerra and Rodan & Fields, because of claims independentย ...
A Wrinkle In Time: Why Rodan + Fieldsโ Founders Lost Their Billionaire Status
Rodan + Fields was one of 16 multi-level marketing companies to receive a warning letter from the Federal Trade Commission earlier this year.
How Diane Dietz Turned Rodan & Fields Into The No. 1 Skincare Brand In North America
Sales at Rodan & Fields has skyrocketed, with market research firm Euromonitor naming it the No. 1 skincare brand in the US in 2016 and 2017.
R+F Similar Companies
BSH Ev Aletleri Tโยบrkiye
BSH is home to both globally established Appliance Brands*, such as Bosch, Siemens, Gaggenau, and Neff, in addition to seven local brands. With our Ecosystem Brand Home Connect and Service Brands such as Simply Yummy and BlueMovement, we offer consumers digital services and sustainable solutions to
Yฤฑldฤฑz Holding
Yฤฑldฤฑz Holdingโin 1944 yฤฑlฤฑnda ฤฐstanbulโda biskรผvi รผretimiyle baลlayan hikรขyesi, bugรผn 300โden fazla markayla 5 kฤฑtada 4 milyar insana ulaลtฤฑrdฤฑฤฤฑmฤฑz gฤฑda-atฤฑลtฤฑrmalฤฑk รผrรผnlerimizle ve Tรผrkiyeโnin her noktasฤฑndaki perakende ลirketlerimizle devam ediyor. Kรถkleri Tรผrkiyeโden beslenen, dallarฤฑ ise dรผ
Cadbury Adams
Cadbury Adams USA has it all wrapped up -- in thin little rectangles wrapped in foil. The US division of British candy giant Cadbury makes candy, chewing gum, and mints. Its brands include Bubblicious, Certs, Chiclets, Dentyne, HALLS, Sour Patch, Swedish Fish, and Trident. The company also makes ret
Procter & Gamble
P&G was founded more than 185 years ago as a soap and candle company. Today, weโre one of the worldโs largest consumer goods companies and home to iconic, trusted brands, including Alwaysยฎ, Charminยฎ, Braunยฎ, Fairyยฎ, Febrezeยฎ, Gilletteยฎ, Head & Shouldersยฎ, Oral Bยฎ, Panteneยฎ, Pampersยฎ, Tideยฎ, and Vick
Ideal Standard International NV
Ideal Standard International is a world leading manufacturer of high-quality residential, commercial and healthcare bathroom solutions. Headquartered in Brussels, Belgium, the privately-owned company employs over 8,000 people, operating at 9 manufacturing sites and serving over 100 countries acros
Mostafa Group of Industries
Today, MGIโs business diversification in the sectors like Edible Oil Products, Coconut Oil, Tank Terminal, Paper Products, Shrimp, Hatchery, Tea, Salt, Tea Garden, Rubber Plantation, Agro Products, Real Estate, Passenger Transportation, Shipping, Flat Steel, Ship Breaking, Long Steel, Artificial Lea
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
R+F CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, R+F has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, R+F has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as We are Rodan + Fields, founded by Stanford-trained dermatologists with a mission to revolutionize skincare for women everywhere. Our products are dermatologist-developed and inspired by Women-Backed Scienceโข, delivering real, visible results. We understand what works for womenโs skin, from acne to the signs of aging, and are dedicated to providing safe, effective solutions that truly work. As the #1 Female Dermatologist-Founded Skincare Brand in the US*, we continue to innovate and grow. With over 12 million customers and more than 15 years of proven results, Rodan + Fields is committed to delivering the best for your skin. We value diversity and inclusivity and are always looking for passionate individuals who want to make a meaningful impact. If youโre driven by science and skincare, and want to help women achieve healthy, glowing skin, weโd love to have you with us. *For more details visit our website.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
