Comparison Overview

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP

VS

Laurence & Phillips IP Law

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP

The Courtyard, Uckfield, TN22 1SL, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Rix & Kay is a full service law firm with offices in Brighton & Hove, East Sussex, and Kent. We retain a strong regional presence across Sussex, Kent, Surrey and London and work in partnership with business owners, entrepreneurs and individuals, providing expert legal advice across a wide range of legal services. We also work in partnership with some of the most successful organisations in the UK both on national and international projects. Our mission is to ‘make law easy for you’ by providing legal services through dedicated, highly trained, teams that engage deeply with clients. Rix & Kay is recognised as a leading firm in the latest editions of The Legal 500 in multiple areas. We can claim significant sector expertise with our lawyers acting as Leaders in their Field. Please find all our current vacancies at: http://www.rixandkay.co.uk/careers/vacancies/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laurence & Phillips IP Law

2220 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20037-1701, US
Last Update: 2026-03-12
Between 750 and 799

Laurence & Phillips IP Law is a U.S. law firm offering patent-related services. We focus primarily on inter partes reviews (IPR) and other post-grant proceedings at the Patent Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Our intellectual property law practice also includes a range of other services such as patent preparation and prosecution, assistance to patent litigation teams, and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Federal Circuit.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rix-&-kay-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurence-&-phillips-ip-law-llp.jpeg
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laurence & Phillips IP Law in 2026.

Incident History — Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laurence & Phillips IP Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laurence & Phillips IP Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rix-&-kay-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurence-&-phillips-ip-law-llp.jpeg
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laurence & Phillips IP Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company.

In the current year, Laurence & Phillips IP Law company and Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company employs more people globally than Laurence & Phillips IP Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.