Comparison Overview

Ritchey Logic

VS

Street Tennis Inc.

Ritchey Logic

US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ritcheylogic.com/

Performance Bicycle Components. We believe state of the art engineering is only useful when it delivers real benefit. Flashy products or the implementation of expensive materials or manufacturing have never been our end goal. That’s why “Logic” has always been the very best word to distinguish Tom’s sophisticated yet sensible approach to component design.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Street Tennis Inc.

None
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://streettennis.com

Street Tennis Inc. is an international company that manufactures and sells the original Street Tennis™ Kit. Street Tennis™ was conceived and designed to make playing tennis fun and accessible for anyone and everyone. Street Tennis kits come complete with a net system, rackets, a durable carry bag and balls. The remarkable Street Tennis™ balls behave just like a traditional tennis ball but a little slower and they make it possible to play tennis on any flat surface including grass. Street Tennis™ set up in minutes and is great for recreational play or as an instructional tool. We like to say that "with Street Tennis™ Beginners Play and Players Compete!"​

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchey-design.jpeg
Ritchey Logic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ritchey Logic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Street Tennis Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ritchey Logic in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Street Tennis Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Ritchey Logic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ritchey Logic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Street Tennis Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Street Tennis Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchey-design.jpeg
Ritchey Logic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/street-tennis-inc..jpeg
Street Tennis Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Street Tennis Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ritchey Logic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Street Tennis Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ritchey Logic company.

In the current year, Street Tennis Inc. company and Ritchey Logic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Street Tennis Inc. company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ritchey Logic company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ritchey Logic company nor Street Tennis Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ritchey Logic company employs more people globally than Street Tennis Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Street Tennis Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References