Regence BlueShield Company Cyber Security Posture
regence.comRegence BlueShield has been a symbol of stability in local communities for 100 years, connecting people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength and security of Blue Cross and Blue Shield, we strive to give you more control, providing superior service and making health care clearer, more cost-effective and focused on results that matter to you. We serve more than 1.5 million people in Washington through their workplace or personal coverage. And we hold strongly to our nonprofit heritage, which means our focus is on helping people first, today and for the long term. Regence BlueShield is an Independent Licensee of The BlueCross BlueShield Association.
Regence BlueShield Company Details
regence-blueshield-of-washington
391 employees
6950.0
524
Insurance
regence.com
Scan still pending
REG_2381601
In-progress
Regence BlueShield Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Regence BlueShield Global Score.png)
Regence BlueShield Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Regence BlueShield Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asuris Northwest Health | Breach | 100 | 4 | 11/2023 | ASU353271123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Healthcare services provider Welltok disclosed a data breach that impacted nearly 8.5 million patients in the U.S. The company was one of the victims of the large-scale hacking campaign exploiting a zero-day in MOVEit Transfer software. Threat actors were able to obtain patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals. The following organisations, on behalf of which Welltok is delivering notice to affected individuals, are Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Corewell Health, Faith Regional Health Services, Mass General, Brigham Health Plan, Priority Health, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Regence Blue Shield of Idaho, St. Bernards Healthcare, and Sutter Health. | |||||||
| Regence BlueShield of Idaho | Breach | 100 | 4 | 11/2023 | REG44271123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The U.S. healthcare services business Welltok revealed a data breach that affected around 8.5 million patients. The business was one among the targets of a widespread hacking campaign that took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer programme. The compromised information includes patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals. The following organisations, on behalf of which Welltok is delivering notice to affected individuals, are Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Corewell Health, Faith Regional Health Services, Mass General, Brigham Health Plan, Priority Health, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Regence Blue Shield of Idaho, St. Bernards Healthcare, and Sutter Health. | |||||||
| Regence BlueShield | Breach | 100 | 5 | 11/2023 | REG42271123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: The U.S. healthcare services business Welltok revealed a data breach that affected around 8.5 million patients. The business was one among the targets of a widespread hacking campaign that took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer programme. The compromised information includes patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals. The following organisations, on behalf of which Welltok is delivering notice to affected individuals, are Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Corewell Health, Faith Regional Health Services, Mass General, Brigham Health Plan, Priority Health, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Regence Blue Shield of Idaho, St. Bernards Healthcare, and Sutter Health. | |||||||
| Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon | Breach | 100 | 4 | 11/2023 | REG41271123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The U.S. healthcare services business Welltok revealed a data breach that affected around 8.5 million patients. The business was one among the targets of a widespread hacking campaign that took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer programme. The exposed information includes patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals. The following organisations, on behalf of which Welltok is delivering notice to affected individuals, are Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Corewell Health, Faith Regional Health Services, Mass General, Brigham Health Plan, Priority Health, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Regence Blue Shield of Idaho, St. Bernards Healthcare, and Sutter Health. | |||||||
Regence BlueShield Company Subsidiaries
Regence BlueShield has been a symbol of stability in local communities for 100 years, connecting people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength and security of Blue Cross and Blue Shield, we strive to give you more control, providing superior service and making health care clearer, more cost-effective and focused on results that matter to you. We serve more than 1.5 million people in Washington through their workplace or personal coverage. And we hold strongly to our nonprofit heritage, which means our focus is on helping people first, today and for the long term. Regence BlueShield is an Independent Licensee of The BlueCross BlueShield Association.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Regence BlueShield Cyber Security News
More than 1 million Michiganders affected by Welltok cyberattack
More than 1 million Michiganders affected by Welltok cyberattack · Attack hit nearly 8.5 million people nationally · Breach went undetected for ...
Data breach affects Michigan healthcare companies
The Michigan Attorney General announced that Corewell Health suffered a data breach affecting Michigan residents, including Social Security ...
Premera Blue Cross pays 2nd-largest HIPAA fine for 2014 breach
Premera Blue Cross will pay $6.9 million in a settlement with the Trump administration over a data breach that exposed confidential ...
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Statement on the Premera Blue Cross Cyber-Attack
Premera Blue Cross (Premera), a health plan in Washington and Alaska, was the target of a sophisticated external cyber-attack to gain unauthorized access to ...
Corewell Health, Priority Health patient data hacked in online breach
Corewell Health data was hacked, exposing about 1 million patients and 2500 Priority Health patients impacted, according to a report from ...
326K Aetna members involved in mailing vendor ransomware fallout
Mailing vendor OneTouchPoint informed 30 health plans their patient data was accessed during a ransomware attack; now 326278 Aetna members ...
Cyberattack on insurance giant disrupting business for doctors, therapists
On Wednesday, the ransomware gang claimed responsibility for hacking Change Healthcare, listing the company as a victim on its dark-web site.
Corewell Health data breach affects 1 million Michiganders
There have been several recent health care data breaches affecting Michiganders, said state Attorney General Dana Nessel.
Tech Moves: Expedia and F5 Networks add board members; Madrona principal departs; and more
Expedia Group appointed Equifax President of Global Consumer Solutions Beverly Anderson as its newest board member.
Regence BlueShield Similar Companies
AIA
AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively “AIA” or the “Group”) comprise the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group. It has a presence in 18 markets – wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR(1), Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Aus
ICICI Lombard
About ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited ICICI Lombard is the leading private general insurance company in the country. The Company offers a comprehensive and well-diversified range of products through multiple distribution channels, including motor, health, crop, fire, personal accide
JLT Asia
As of 1 April, 2019, JLT Asia is now a part of Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC). This account will now be managed by Marsh. We believe clients will benefit from access to broader talent, deeper risk expertise and specialty capabilities, broader geographic reach, and more capacity in digital, data,
USI Insurance Services
USI is one of the largest insurance brokerage and consulting firms in the world, delivering property and casualty, employee benefits, personal risk, program and retirement solutions to large risk management clients, middle market companies, smaller firms and individuals. Headquartered in Valhalla, N
Seguros SURA
SURA es una compañía que integra en diferentes empresas soluciones en seguros y seguridad social. Su marca se presenta a los clientes como Seguros SURA, ARL SURA y EPS SURA. Existen otras marcas y empresas, especialmente de prestación de servicios, que hacen parte de la Compañía. Nuestra experienc
Rosgosstrakh
RGS operates nationwide with over 2,500 branches, agencies and over 400 claims-handling offices covering every one of Russia's 86 regions - from Kaliningrad on the Baltic Sea in the West to Kamchatka on the Pacific Ocean in the Far East, and from Murmansk on the Barents Sea to Sochi (2014 Winter Oly
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Regence BlueShield CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Regence BlueShield has faced 4 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Regence BlueShield has been a symbol of stability in local communities for 100 years, connecting people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength and security of Blue Cross and Blue Shield, we strive to give you more control, providing superior service and making health care clearer, more cost-effective and focused on results that matter to you. We serve more than 1.5 million people in Washington through their workplace or personal coverage. And we hold strongly to our nonprofit heritage, which means our focus is on helping people first, today and for the long term. Regence BlueShield is an Independent Licensee of The BlueCross BlueShield Association..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
