Comparison Overview

PT PLN (Persero)

VS

Xcel Energy

PT PLN (Persero)

Jl. Trunojoyo Blok M I/135, Jakarta Selatan, 12160, ID
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pln.co.id

Indonesia State Electricity Corporation PLN has a long history in electricity industry of Indonesia. As the sole provider of electricity in Indonesia, PLN is striving to increase quality of services to all Indonesian. In 1972, in accordance with Government Regulation No.17, the State-owned Electricity Company was enacted as a State-owned General Electricity Company and as PKUK responsible to provide electricity to meet public needs. While the Government policy was giving opportunity to the Private Sectors to focus on the provision of electricity, the status of PLN was changed from a General Company to Corporation’ as well as PKUK in providing electricity for public needs until the present. Throughout the 75 years of journey, PT PLN (Persero) has succeeded in becoming one of the companies with the largest assets in Indonesia of IDR 1,589 Trillion (PT PLN (Persero) Financial Report 2020 Audited).

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 24,902
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Xcel Energy

401 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.xcelenergy.com

A leading energy provider, dedicated to excellence. We make energy work better for our customers, helping them thrive every day. That means always raising the bar - delivering better service and providing more reliable, resilient and sustainable energy to the eight states we serve: Minnesota, Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. At Xcel Energy, we provide work that makes a difference, a team you can count on, opportunities to grow and rewards that help you thrive. Ready to help power the future of energy? Visit jobs.xcelenergy.com to learn more.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,741
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT PLN (Persero)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xcel Energy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT PLN (Persero) in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xcel Energy in 2026.

Incident History — PT PLN (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT PLN (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xcel Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xcel Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Xcel Energy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT PLN (Persero) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Xcel Energy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PT PLN (Persero) company.

In the current year, Xcel Energy company and PT PLN (Persero) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Xcel Energy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PT PLN (Persero) company employs more people globally than Xcel Energy company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Xcel Energy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References