Public Services and Procurement Canada | Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada Company Cyber Security Posture
tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.caWe serve federal departments and agencies as their central purchasing agent, real property manager, treasurer, accountant, pay and pension administrator, integrity adviser and linguistic authority. Terms of use: https://www.canada.ca/en/transparency/terms.html#interact-with --- Nous servons les ministères et organismes fédéraux en tant qu'acheteur central, gestionnaire de biens immobiliers, trésorier, comptable, administrateur de la paye et des pensions, conseiller en matière d'intégrité et spécialiste des questions linguistiques. Conditions d'utilisation : https://www.canada.ca/fr/transparence/avis.html#echanger
PSPC|SPEAC Company Details
pspc-spac
7863 employees
183489
922
Government Administration
tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca
Scan still pending
PUB_3726243
In-progress
PSPC|SPEAC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
PSPC|SPEAC Global Score.png)
Public Services and Procurement Canada | Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Public Services and Procurement Canada | Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada Revenue Agency - Agence du revenu du Canada | Breach | 85 | 4 | 06/2018 | CAN17246822 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Canada Revenue Agency logs 2,338 privacy breaches in just under 2 years. The personal, confidential information of over 80,000 individual Canadians held by the Canada Revenue Agency may have been accessed without authorization over the last 21 months. But only a handful affected a large number of Canadians. | |||||||
| Public Services and Procurement Canada | Breach | 60 | 3 | 09/2018 | PUB110311022 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: A significant data breach happened in the federal government after a device was stolen from Public Services and Procurement Canada. PSPC is Infrastructure Canada’s service provider for pay, pension and benefits. All 227 employees were affected are at Infrastructure Canada No banking or social insurance information was affected. Name, person record identifier (PRI), date of birth, home address and salary range may have been compromised. | |||||||
| Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada | Breach | 80 | 4 | 10/2022 | CAN206221122 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Canada Border Services Agency suffered a data breach incident after a contractor led to the unauthorised access of up to 1.38 million licence plates and related information. The investigation found that the contract lacked clauses with respect to security safeguards, including for the protection and retention of personal information. Bad actors were able to break into the third-party contractors’ systems through an unpatched and decommissioned server, where they were able to access, copy, and remove files from the network, before posting some of the data on the dark web. The breach exposed around 9,000 licence plate photos of travellers crossing into Canada from the border crossing in Cornwall, Ontario. | |||||||
| Government of Canada | Cyber Attack | 100 | 6 | 06/2015 | GOV192330422 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: Several Canadian government websites and servers were targeted in a cyberattack by the hacking group Anonymous. The attack affected several websites for government services, including canada.ca, as well as the site of Canada’s spy agency, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). The attack was aimed to show their retaliation for a new anti-terrorism law passed by Canada’s politicians. | |||||||
| Public Services and Procurement Canada | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 08/2022 | PUB2215251022 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: A device was stolen from Public Services and Procurement Canada. PSPC is Infrastructure Canada’s service provider for pay, pension and benefits. All 227 employees affected are at Infrastructure Canada. The device in question was stolen on Aug 20 and affected employees were informed on Sept 7. No banking or social insurance information was affected. Name, person record identifier (PRI), date of birth, home address and salary range have been compromised. Ottawa police have been made aware of the incident. | |||||||
| Government of Canada | Data Leak | 60 | 3 | 08/2018 | GOV12181122 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The governments of Canada was exposed to the entire internet details of software bugs and security plans, as well as passwords for servers, official internet domains, conference calls, and an event-planning system by misconfiguring pages on Trello, a project management website. 25 Canadian government trello boards had sensitive information, such as remote file access, or FTP, credentials, and login details for the Eventbrite event-planning platform. The government of Canada said, Departments and agencies of the Government of Canada must apply adequate security controls to protect their users, information, and assets. Employees are being reminded of their obligation never to communicate or store sensitive information on Trello boards or any other unauthorized digital tool or service. | |||||||
Public Services and Procurement Canada | Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada Company Subsidiaries
We serve federal departments and agencies as their central purchasing agent, real property manager, treasurer, accountant, pay and pension administrator, integrity adviser and linguistic authority. Terms of use: https://www.canada.ca/en/transparency/terms.html#interact-with --- Nous servons les ministères et organismes fédéraux en tant qu'acheteur central, gestionnaire de biens immobiliers, trésorier, comptable, administrateur de la paye et des pensions, conseiller en matière d'intégrité et spécialiste des questions linguistiques. Conditions d'utilisation : https://www.canada.ca/fr/transparence/avis.html#echanger
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
PSPC|SPEAC Cyber Security News
Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation's Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144
The People's Republic of China presents the most active and persistent cyber threat to United States Government, private sector, and critical ...
Trump scraps Biden software security, AI, post-quantum encryption efforts in new executive order
The White House accused the Biden administration of trying to “sneak problematic and distracting issues into cybersecurity policy.”
Trump revokes digital identity actions in new cyber executive order
President Donald Trump has signed a new cybersecurity executive order that continues many of the policies of his predecessors, ...
Trump Drops A Cybersecurity Bombshell With Biden-Era Policy Reversal
Trump's June 2025 cybersecurity executive order rolls back key Biden-era mandates, refocuses AI policy, eliminates digital ID initiatives ...
Google scam: Gmail, Google Calendar, Meet invites with phishing links used to deceive and defraud, cybersecurity experts warn
Scammers are using Gmail, Google Calendar and Meet invites with phishing links to deceive and defraud victims, Chicago cybersecurity experts ...
How cybersecurity standout CrowdStrike aims to capitalize on the AI agent gold rush
CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz sees big business in helping companies safeguard their AI agents.
Malicious Browser Extensions Infect Over 700 Users Across Latin America Since Early 2025
A phishing campaign infects 722 users with malicious browser extensions in Latin America to steal bank login data.
Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'
Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in U.S. cyberdefenses.
Kettering Health: Ransomware group believed to be responsible for cybersecurity incident
Kettering Health shared an update on its cybersecurity incident, sharing they identified what they believe is the reason behind the incident ...
PSPC|SPEAC Similar Companies
Texas Health and Human Services
Overview The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is an agency within the Texas Health and Human Services System. In September 2016, Texas began transforming how it delivers health and human services to qualified Texans, with a goal of making the Health and Human Services System more ef
Queensland Government
We are the largest and most diverse organisation in our state. We have more than 90 government departments and organisations providing essential services across 4000+ locations—from the Torres Strait to the Gold Coast; Mount Isa to Brisbane. We are passionate about making Queensland better through
Prefeitura Municipal de Campinas
Prefeitura Municipal de Campinas - www.campinas.sp.gov.br Campinas City Hall (Brasil) Situada no coração de São Paulo, o estado mais desenvolvido do Brasil, Campinas vive o seu melhor momento em décadas, tanto no campo econômico quanto no social. A cidade nunca esteve tão preparada para receber
TAHRI Mohamed Bechar University
L'Université de Béchar Est un établissement universitaire Algérien crée pour la première fois en 1986. INES puis CUB pour Centre Universitaire de Béchar et le 07/01/2009 déclaré comme université. Depuis peu, le monde est entré dans le 3ème millénaire. Un millénaire qui nous impose des défis au
State of Florida
Join Florida’s talented workforce to fulfill your professional goals and achieve a meaningful career. Our talented public servants work hard to serve more than 19 million residents across Florida, and you, too, can realize success in the Sunshine State. Working in Florida’s state government mean
State of Missouri
Build the Missouri of tomorrow. Ensure a strong foundation today. Join a group of innovative team members focused on driving the State of Missouri forward. As public servants, our team members have the opportunity to produce work that is both lasting and important. This work serves to protect famil
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PSPC|SPEAC CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PSPC|SPEAC has faced 6 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack', 'Breach', 'Data Leak'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as We serve federal departments and agencies as their central purchasing agent, real property manager, treasurer, accountant, pay and pension administrator, integrity adviser and linguistic authority. Terms of use: https://www.canada.ca/en/transparency/terms.html#interact-with --- Nous servons les ministères et organismes fédéraux en tant qu'acheteur central, gestionnaire de biens immobiliers, trésorier, comptable, administrateur de la paye et des pensions, conseiller en matière d'intégrité et spécialiste des questions linguistiques. Conditions d'utilisation : https://www.canada.ca/fr/transparence/avis.html#echanger.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach', 'Cyber Attack'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
