Comparison Overview

provizer and phillips, p.c.

VS

Norman Waterhouse

provizer and phillips, p.c.

None
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://provizer-phillips.com

Highly Regarded suburban Detroit law firm known for its excellent, cost effective and personal service for its local and national clients. The firm has been in business for over 40 years and specializes in complex litigation, including professional liability, construction, environmental and toxic tort, class action, premises liability, insurance coverage, and disability matters. The firm's principals, Randall Phillips and Marilyn Madorsky are AV rated by Martindale Hubbell. They have been published in industry journals and have presented at a variety of conferences.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Norman Waterhouse

431 King William St, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-03-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.normans.com.au

Our ability to exceed client expectations has led to our success in a range of services embracing all aspects of business. The Norman Waterhouse philosophy means that we consider ourselves to be part of your team. We provide legal advice and representation in transactions and dispute resolution to a broad range of clients, both public and private, nationally and internationally. Our people demonstrate considerable skills in commercial and legal environments and are committed to providing advice and solutions that maximise opportunity and minimise risk. Our advice is always focussed on the best strategic outcome. Established in 1920, our partnership is built on values of excellence, integrity and trust. Our people form a cohesive, creative team, and provide timely and effective advice, while remaining sensitive to the commercial realities of the marketplace.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
provizer and phillips, p.c.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norman-waterhouse.jpeg
Norman Waterhouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
provizer and phillips, p.c.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Norman Waterhouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for provizer and phillips, p.c. in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norman Waterhouse in 2026.

Incident History — provizer and phillips, p.c. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

provizer and phillips, p.c. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Norman Waterhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norman Waterhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
provizer and phillips, p.c.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norman-waterhouse.jpeg
Norman Waterhouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

provizer and phillips, p.c. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Norman Waterhouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Norman Waterhouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to provizer and phillips, p.c. company.

In the current year, Norman Waterhouse company and provizer and phillips, p.c. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Norman Waterhouse company nor provizer and phillips, p.c. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Norman Waterhouse company nor provizer and phillips, p.c. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Norman Waterhouse company nor provizer and phillips, p.c. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. company nor Norman Waterhouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. company nor Norman Waterhouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Norman Waterhouse company employs more people globally than provizer and phillips, p.c. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither provizer and phillips, p.c. nor Norman Waterhouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References