
Providence Health & Services Company Cyber Security Posture
providence.orgAt Providence, our strength begins with understanding. We take time to see, hear and value everyone who walks through our doorsโpatient or caregiver, family support person or volunteer. Working with us means that regardless of your role, weโll walk alongside you in your career, supporting you so you can support others. Providence Health & Services and our family of organizations are gradually coming together under a unified Providence brand over the next two years. Together, our 120,000 caregivers (all employees) serve in 52 hospitals, 1,085 clinics and a comprehensive range of health and social services across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington. Weโre looking for exceptional caregivers who can connect with our mission and make it their own, every day. Thatโs what sets us apart. Thatโs health with human connection.
PH&S Company Details
providence-health-and-services
20025 employees
135541.0
62
Hospitals and Health Care
providence.org
185
PRO_2396094
In-progress

Between 700 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

Providence Health & Services Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 700 and 800 |
Providence Health & Services Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. Joseph Health | Breach | 90 | 3 | 02/2016 | STJ2513522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Saint Josephโs Healthcare System suffered a security breach that compromised some employees' personal information. The healthcare was targeted in a phishing scam that led to the unintentional disclosure of around 5,000 employees' information, including social security numbers. The system notified the federal authorities to investigate the incident. | |||||||
Providence | Ransomware | 75 | 2 | 10/2023 | PRO8295124 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: ESO Solutions, a key software provider for healthcare and emergency services, was the victim of a ransomware attack. This cyberattack led to unauthorized data access and encryption of various company systems. The breach exposed a variety of personal information, depending on what patients had shared with their healthcare providers using ESOโs software. Compromised data includes: Full names Birth dates Phone numbers Patient account and medical record numbers Injury, diagnosis, treatment, and procedure details Social Security Numbers. It was confirmed that this breach affected data belonging to patients associated with ESOโs client hospitals and clinics in the U.S. To help mitigate risks, ESO is offering a year of identity monitoring services through Kroll to all notified individuals. | |||||||
Providence Institute for Human Caring | Ransomware | 100 | 4 | 10/2023 | PRO8315124 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: A ransomware attack occurred against ESO Solutions, a significant software provider for emergency services and healthcare. This incident resulted from unauthorised data access and system encryption across many enterprise platforms. Depending on the information patients have shared with their healthcare providers using ESO's software, a range of personal data was exposed in the hack. Among the compromised data are: complete names dates of birth Numbers to call Numbers for patient accounts and medical records Details of the injury, diagnosis, treatment, and procedure, and Social Security numbers. It was established that patient data connected to U.S. hospitals and clinics that ESO serves as a client was compromised. All notified parties will receive a year of identity monitoring services from Kroll through ESO to assist in reducing risks. |
Providence Health & Services Company Subsidiaries

At Providence, our strength begins with understanding. We take time to see, hear and value everyone who walks through our doorsโpatient or caregiver, family support person or volunteer. Working with us means that regardless of your role, weโll walk alongside you in your career, supporting you so you can support others. Providence Health & Services and our family of organizations are gradually coming together under a unified Providence brand over the next two years. Together, our 120,000 caregivers (all employees) serve in 52 hospitals, 1,085 clinics and a comprehensive range of health and social services across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington. Weโre looking for exceptional caregivers who can connect with our mission and make it their own, every day. Thatโs what sets us apart. Thatโs health with human connection.
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
PH&S Cyber Security News
Providence CEO says U.S. healthcare facing a 'polycrisis'
From 2023 to the end of 2024, Providence saw a $500 million revenue hit due to reimbursement challenges as a result of downcoding, denials andย ...
OCR fines Providence $240,000 in ransomware case
OCR fines Providence $240,000 in ransomware case. With large ransomware breaches up more than 260% since 2018, "the health care sector needs toย ...
$240,000 Penalty Against CA-Based Providence Medical Institute
Two potential violations of the HIPAA Security Rule were revealed, including failure to have a business associate agreement in place and failureย ...
Collective Health Appoints New CPO and CISO to Advance Company Growth Strategy and Cybersecurity Capabilities
As CISO and VP of Engineering, Keven Sticher will lead Collective Health's security, infrastructure, and IT teams and strategy, helping ensureย ...
OCR Imposes $240,000 HIPAA Fine on Californian Healthcare Provider
This is the 8th HIPAA enforcement action in 2024 to result in a financial penalty. OCR has imposed 3 civil monetary penalties to resolveย ...
Deloitte has paid RI $5M for the cybersecurity breach. What we know.
Deloitte had agreed to pay $5 million to cover two months of state-paid health-care coverage by Blue Cross & Blue Shield and Neighborhood Health.
Hackers leaked data from Rhode Island ransomware attack, officials warn
Officials said in a late December briefing the attack impacted about 650,000 people, with a range of personally identifiable data being leaked.
UnitedHealth cyberattack and more: The 10 biggest health data breaches of 2024
The Change Healthcare cyberattack caused unprecedented disruptions for hospitals and providers, experts say. Analysts call it the worst cyberattack ever seenย ...
Vendor data breach affects Providence Swedish patient information
The compromised data includes patient names, birth dates, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial account information and/or medical-ย ...

PH&S Similar Companies

Geisinger
Geisinger is among the nationโs leading providers of value-based care, serving 1.2 million people in urban and rural communities across Pennsylvania. Founded in 1915 by philanthropist Abigail Geisinger, the nonprofit system generates $10 billion in annual revenues across 126 care sites โ including 1

Aster DM Healthcare
From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 366 medical establishments, including 34 hospitals, 131 clinics and 502 pharmacies in 7 countries and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthcare authority across th

Zuellig Pharma
Zuellig Pharma is a leading integrated healthcare solutions company in Asia with experience spanning over a century in the region. Partnering with multinational pharmaceutical manufacturers, governments, healthcare providers, and professionals, we broaden access to pharmaceutical and healthcare prod

Region Skรฅne
Region Skรฅne, or Skรฅne Regional Council, is the self-governing authority of Skรฅne, the southernmost county of Sweden. Region Skรฅne has its head office in the city of Kristianstad and has work places in every municipality in Skรฅne. Region Skรฅne is responsible for healthcare and medical services, t

NSW Health
โโโโโโโWith more than 170,000 staff and 228 hospitals, there are millions of ways we are enriching the health of the NSW community every day. In front of a patient, working in a kitchen, developing new treatments, or at a desk, each one of our staff is a vital member of the largest health organisat

Providence
Every day, 119,000 compassionate caregivers serve patients and communities through Providence St. Joseph Health, a national, Catholic, not-for-profit health system, driven by a belief that health is a human right. Rooted in the founding missions of the Sisters of Providence and the Sisters of St.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PH&S CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PH&S has faced 3 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Ransomware', 'Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as At Providence, our strength begins with understanding. We take time to see, hear and value everyone who walks through our doorsโpatient or caregiver, family support person or volunteer. Working with us means that regardless of your role, weโll walk alongside you in your career, supporting you so you can support others. Providence Health & Services and our family of organizations are gradually coming together under a unified Providence brand over the next two years. Together, our 120,000 caregivers (all employees) serve in 52 hospitals, 1,085 clinics and a comprehensive range of health and social services across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington. Weโre looking for exceptional caregivers who can connect with our mission and make it their own, every day. Thatโs what sets us apart. Thatโs health with human connection..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Ransomware'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
