Comparison Overview

ProsourceFit

VS

McDavid

ProsourceFit

8955 Fullbright Avenue, Chatsworth, 91311, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prosourcefit.com

ProsourceFit makes high quality products for strength and resistance training, performance, muscle recovery, yoga and Pilates. We exist to inspire active, healthy lifestyles with products that make fitness attainable and enjoyable for everyone. We do this by constantly pursuing innovation as we find new ways to enhance the customer experience, and develop higher quality products to meet our customers’ evolving needs. Train like a pro, train with ProsourceFit!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

McDavid

10305 Argonne Dr, Woodridge, 60517, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 700 and 749
http://www.McDavidUSA.com

McDavid, Inc. designs and markets sports medicine and sports protection products, inaddition to performance apparel for active people and athletes. McDavid® products are at the top of the recommended lists of pro athletes, sports medicine professionals and athletic trainers. From research-backed ankle braces to protective apparel with HEX™ technology, McDavid® products address both the broad range and the specific needs of professional, collegiate and all athletes across a variety of sports. The company is headquartered in Chicago with subsidiaries in Japan and Europe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosourcefit.com.jpeg
ProsourceFit
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdavidusa.jpeg
McDavid
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ProsourceFit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McDavid
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProsourceFit in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McDavid in 2026.

Incident History — ProsourceFit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProsourceFit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McDavid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McDavid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosourcefit.com.jpeg
ProsourceFit
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdavidusa.jpeg
McDavid
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hidden code placed on webservers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ProsourceFit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McDavid company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

McDavid company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ProsourceFit company has not reported any.

In the current year, McDavid company and ProsourceFit company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McDavid company nor ProsourceFit company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

McDavid company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ProsourceFit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither McDavid company nor ProsourceFit company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ProsourceFit company nor McDavid company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ProsourceFit company nor McDavid company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McDavid company employs more people globally than ProsourceFit company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ProsourceFit nor McDavid holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References