Porto de Lisboa Company Cyber Security Posture
portodelisboa.ptO Porto de Lisboa é um grande porto europeu de orientação atlântica, cuja centralidade geo-estratégica lhe confere um estatuto de relevo nas cadeias logísticas do comércio internacional e nos principais circuitos de cruzeiros. O porto é líder nacional no movimento de navios (em número e em GT) e ocupa o 1º lugar no ranking nacional de movimentação de carga contentorizada e de granéis sólidos agro-alimentares. Estes dois tipos de mercadorias colocam o Porto de Lisboa a par dos principais portos ibéricos. Como resultado da firme aposta na satisfação das necessidades e exigências dos seus clientes, alicerçada na prestação de um serviço de máxima qualidade, o Porto de Lisboa tem registado ao longo dos anos um crescimento notável em todos os seus negócios: a movimentação de carga, o turismo de cruzeiros, o transporte fluvial, a náutica de recreio e a dinamização cultural e de entretenimento de toda a zona ribeirinha sob a sua jurisdição.
PDL Company Details
porto-de-lisboa
27 employees
4725
561
Facilities Services
portodelisboa.pt
Scan still pending
POR_2046156
In-progress
PDL Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
PDL Global Score.png)
Porto de Lisboa Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Porto de Lisboa Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porto de Lisboa | Cyber Attack | 60 | 2 | 12/2022 | POR195151023 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: The Port of Lisbon is the third-largest port in Portugal and one of the main European ports was targeted by the cyber attack. The port's website came under a cyber attack on December 25, and as a result of the security flaw, the administrators had to shut it down. The port's website is still offline as of the time of writing. The essential infrastructure's operating activities was not hampered by the cyberattack. The issue was reported by the administration to the Judiciary Police and the National Cybersecurity Centre. The United States Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection both place a strong emphasis on cybersecurity as a result of the rising level of technology used in our ports. | |||||||
Porto de Lisboa Company Subsidiaries
O Porto de Lisboa é um grande porto europeu de orientação atlântica, cuja centralidade geo-estratégica lhe confere um estatuto de relevo nas cadeias logísticas do comércio internacional e nos principais circuitos de cruzeiros. O porto é líder nacional no movimento de navios (em número e em GT) e ocupa o 1º lugar no ranking nacional de movimentação de carga contentorizada e de granéis sólidos agro-alimentares. Estes dois tipos de mercadorias colocam o Porto de Lisboa a par dos principais portos ibéricos. Como resultado da firme aposta na satisfação das necessidades e exigências dos seus clientes, alicerçada na prestação de um serviço de máxima qualidade, o Porto de Lisboa tem registado ao longo dos anos um crescimento notável em todos os seus negócios: a movimentação de carga, o turismo de cruzeiros, o transporte fluvial, a náutica de recreio e a dinamização cultural e de entretenimento de toda a zona ribeirinha sob a sua jurisdição.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
PDL Cyber Security News
Telles strengthens its team with two new lawyers
Telles has announced the strengthening of its team with two new associates. Sílvia Lima joins the firm's corporate, transactions and private equity team.
Updates: Spain, Portugal hit by huge power outage; cause investigated
A blackout has hit Spain and Portugal, halting trains, cutting phone service and shutting down traffic lights and ATM machines. Spanish power ...
Power In Spain, Portugal Knocked Out By Atmospheric Anomaly
The rare outage saw traffic paralysed as traffic signals failed, flights grounded, people trapped in lifts and energy cut to millions of homes ...
Spain and Portugal power outage: what caused it, and was there a cyber-attack?
Several countries in Europe have been scrambling to restore electricity after a huge power cut caused blackouts.
Spain will take 'all necessary measures' to prevent another blackout, says PM - live updates
Power has now been fully restored in Spain and Portugal, as officials continue to investigate what caused the outage.
Port of Lisbon targeted by LockBit ransomware hackers, website still down
The LockBit ransomware gang claims to have stolen financial reports, audits, budgets, contracts, cargo information, ship logs, crew details, ...
Hitachi Energy in Portugal
Hitachi Energy is a global technology leader that is championing the urgency of a clean energy transition through innovation and collaboration – towards a ...
LockBit ransomware claims attack on Port of Lisbon in Portugal
The ransomware gang claims to have stolen financial reports, audits, budgets, contracts, cargo information, ship logs, crew details, customer ...
Power Outage: Spain update on cyberattack fears as cause of disruption still unknown
A major "technical issue" between France and Spain's power connection triggered today's unprecedented blackout across the Iberian Peninsula, ...
PDL Similar Companies
Servest SA
Servest is a leading black-owned facilities management company, providing integrated facilities solutions for the internal and external built and marine environments; including solutions such as internal and external design and space planning, cost optimisation analysis, carbon impact reduction, cle
Ambius United Kingdom
Ambius us the world's largest provider of plants, replica foliage and flowers for commercial environments. We not only specialise in designing, installing and servicing acclimatised, interior plants and pots, but also offer additional services such as exterior landscaping, flowers, artificial plan
Grupo Facility
A Facility faz a gestão de soluções corporativas para diversos segmentos da economia. Assumimos funções e processos de negócios de clientes em diferentes áreas agregando conhecimento, qualidade e redução de custos. Para isso desenvolvemos unidades de negócios que entendem e se adaptam ao processo
Chisty cvet service
Компания «Чистый свет» входит в группу компаний FACILICOM и является одним из крупнейших поставщиков услуг по профессиональной уборке объектов недвижимости (Facility Services) на украинском и российском рынке. В 1997 году открыты наши представительства в Украине и России. Сегодня в группе компан
TanzifcoCompanyWLL
Established in 1963, Tanzifco is one of the leading cleaning service providers in the Middle East with its branches spreading across the region. Tanzifco prides itself on providing complete range of services starting from waste management to commercial cleaning. We have become one of the leading se
ATS
From initial site setup to ongoing operations, we provide high-quality, tailored services underpinned by local expertise, advanced technology and an unwavering commitment to safety, quality and community empowerment. Our Services • Remote site development: From concept to completion, we design, cons
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PDL CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PDL has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as O Porto de Lisboa é um grande porto europeu de orientação atlântica, cuja centralidade geo-estratégica lhe confere um estatuto de relevo nas cadeias logísticas do comércio internacional e nos principais circuitos de cruzeiros. O porto é líder nacional no movimento de navios (em número e em GT) e ocupa o 1º lugar no ranking nacional de movimentação de carga contentorizada e de granéis sólidos agro-alimentares. Estes dois tipos de mercadorias colocam o Porto de Lisboa a par dos principais portos ibéricos. Como resultado da firme aposta na satisfação das necessidades e exigências dos seus clientes, alicerçada na prestação de um serviço de máxima qualidade, o Porto de Lisboa tem registado ao longo dos anos um crescimento notável em todos os seus negócios: a movimentação de carga, o turismo de cruzeiros, o transporte fluvial, a náutica de recreio e a dinamização cultural e de entretenimento de toda a zona ribeirinha sob a sua jurisdição..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
