Porsche Japan Company Cyber Security Posture
porsche.com「私は自らが理想とする車を探したが、どこにも見つからなかった。だから自分で造ることにした。」 ポルシェAGの創始者フェルディナンド・ポルシェの長男であるフェリー・ポルシェが残したこの言葉から、夢への熱烈な信念はポルシェのミッションとなっています。 ポルシェジャパンは、ポルシェ本社100％出資の子会社として1995年に設立しました。911をアイコンにモデルレンジを拡充しながら、2021年10月に、千葉県木更津市へ世界で9箇所目となるポルシェのブランド体験施設として開設した「ポルシェ・エクスペリエンスセンター東京」は、様々な方がポルシェブランドの魅力を体験できる場所となっています。さらに2022年4月には日本初の都市型コンセプトストア「ポルシェスタジオ日本橋」をオープン。同年8月にはポルシェ公認レストランが併設する「ポルシェスタジオ銀座」を国内2店舗目のポルシェスタジオとしてオープンしました。 このように常に進化し続けることを通じ、夢を追う人のためのブランドとして今日もあくなき努力と挑戦を続け、自動車業界を先導しています。ポルシェジャパンでは、この想いやミッションに共感し、ともに夢を追い続けてくれる人材を歓迎します。
Porsche Japan Company Details
porschejapan
64 employees
1885
336
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
porsche.com
Scan still pending
POR_3175552
In-progress
Porsche Japan Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Porsche Japan Global Score.png)
Porsche Japan Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Porsche Japan Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche Japan | Data Leak | 85 | 4 | 02/2018 | POR15136622 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: More than 28,000 email addresses of Porsche Japan customers' data have been leaked via a hack. It included 23,151 email addresses belonging to customers who asked for product brochures via the internet between 2000 and 2009. Customers’ names, postal addresses, phone numbers and income information may also have been compromised. | |||||||
Porsche Japan Company Subsidiaries
「私は自らが理想とする車を探したが、どこにも見つからなかった。だから自分で造ることにした。」 ポルシェAGの創始者フェルディナンド・ポルシェの長男であるフェリー・ポルシェが残したこの言葉から、夢への熱烈な信念はポルシェのミッションとなっています。 ポルシェジャパンは、ポルシェ本社100％出資の子会社として1995年に設立しました。911をアイコンにモデルレンジを拡充しながら、2021年10月に、千葉県木更津市へ世界で9箇所目となるポルシェのブランド体験施設として開設した「ポルシェ・エクスペリエンスセンター東京」は、様々な方がポルシェブランドの魅力を体験できる場所となっています。さらに2022年4月には日本初の都市型コンセプトストア「ポルシェスタジオ日本橋」をオープン。同年8月にはポルシェ公認レストランが併設する「ポルシェスタジオ銀座」を国内2店舗目のポルシェスタジオとしてオープンしました。 このように常に進化し続けることを通じ、夢を追う人のためのブランドとして今日もあくなき努力と挑戦を続け、自動車業界を先導しています。ポルシェジャパンでは、この想いやミッションに共感し、ともに夢を追い続けてくれる人材を歓迎します。
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Porsche Japan Cyber Security News
Porsche scales up its cybersecurity activities
Porsche is launching a bug bounty programme in October to work with external cybersecurity researchers on further improving the security of ...
Cato Networks Delivers High-Speed Networks to Racing Venues Around the World, Achieving SASE Speed Record
Finally in Tokyo! Cato Networks, the company behind racing, achieves 10G transfer, the first SASE vendor to do so.
Porsche Macan's future mightn't be EV-only after all - report
The internal combustion-powered Macan was axed from European showrooms in April 2024 as it no longer complied with strict cybersecurity laws, ...
Carmakers Park Aging Models as U.N. Cyber Rule Comes Into Effect
Some of the tech updates required to bring older Porsche and VW cars into compliance are too expensive, manufacturers say.
Cybersecurity Law Forces Porsche To Kill Gas-Powered Macan In Europe [Update]
Internal-combustion Macan sales will end in Europe as a result of a new cybersecurity law coming into effect in July.
Critical flaws found in Ferrari, Mercedes, BMW, Porsche, and other carmakers
BMW, Mercedes, Toyota, and other popular carmakers use vulnerable APIs that could have allowed attackers to perform malicious activities.
Cyber rules killing off car models
Models set to be axed in most markets include the Porsche Macan, Cayman and Boxster (ICE versions only), Volkswagen Up, Smart, and some models from Renault, ...
This Is Why The Porsche 718 Boxster And Cayman Have Been Killed Off In Europe
Porsche has discontinued the 718 Boxster and Cayman models in Europe, leaving ICE-obsessed buyers in the EU with even less choice than before.
Why Porsche North America Sued Singer Vehicle Design [UPDATED]
Essentially, Porsche North America sued Singer for using its stylized logo, its crest, the "Porsche" name, and the "911" moniker. We ...
Porsche Japan Similar Companies
Hankook Tire
Hankook Tire & Technology drives persistent innovation to take a leap forward as a global top-tier company paving the way for the future of driving. Hankook Tire & Technology will transform itself into 'The Future Driving Innovator' that realizes future driving through persistent innovation. We a
Volkswagen do Brasil
A gente sabe que o nome “Volkswagen” com certeza deve fazer parte da sua história. Porque a gente também sabe que não é à toa que estamos na vida, no coração e na garagem dos brasileiros. O segredo? Construímos os carros mais inovadores, tornamos as tecnologias acessíveis e dizemos sempre que estamo
Hyundai Motor India Ltd.
Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC). HMIL is India’s first smart mobility solutions provider and the number one car exporter since its inception in India. It currently has 12 car models across segments GRAND i10 NIOS, All New i20, i20 N Line
Audi South Africa
At Audi, there is a rare spirit. A spirit of bravery and pioneering. It's what motivates our engineers, our people and ultimately our drivers. It's what makes Audi like no other car in the world. Vorsprung durch Technik: these words are not merely a catch phrase, it is the way we do things at Aud
Motherson Group
Founded in 1975, Motherson is one of the world’s leading auto component makers, supplying OEMs globally from over 350 facilities in 41 countries spread across five continents with over 180,000 employees. Within the automotive industry, it is one of the leading global manufacturers of exterior rear
FORVIA HELLA
FORVIA HELLA is a listed international automotive supplier. As a company of the FORVIA Group, FORVIA HELLA stands for high-performance lighting technology and vehicle electronics and, with the Lifecycle Solutions Business Group, also covers a broad service and product portfolio for the spare parts a
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Porsche Japan CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Porsche Japan has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Data Leak'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as 「私は自らが理想とする車を探したが、どこにも見つからなかった。だから自分で造ることにした。」 ポルシェAGの創始者フェルディナンド・ポルシェの長男であるフェリー・ポルシェが残したこの言葉から、夢への熱烈な信念はポルシェのミッションとなっています。 ポルシェジャパンは、ポルシェ本社100％出資の子会社として1995年に設立しました。911をアイコンにモデルレンジを拡充しながら、2021年10月に、千葉県木更津市へ世界で9箇所目となるポルシェのブランド体験施設として開設した「ポルシェ・エクスペリエンスセンター東京」は、様々な方がポルシェブランドの魅力を体験できる場所となっています。さらに2022年4月には日本初の都市型コンセプトストア「ポルシェスタジオ日本橋」をオープン。同年8月にはポルシェ公認レストランが併設する「ポルシェスタジオ銀座」を国内2店舗目のポルシェスタジオとしてオープンしました。 このように常に進化し続けることを通じ、夢を追う人のためのブランドとして今日もあくなき努力と挑戦を続け、自動車業界を先導しています。ポルシェジャパンでは、この想いやミッションに共感し、ともに夢を追い続けてくれる人材を歓迎します。.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
