Patanjali Ayurved Limited Company Cyber Security Posture
patanjaliayurved.orgPatanjali Ayurved Limited was established in 2006 with a thought of rural and urban development. The company is not merely an organization but a thought of creating a healthy society through Yog and Ayurved. We value our consumers and we believe by providing quality products a quality life for them can be created. This is our primary apprehension and thus, we try to take every measure to ensure quality like the Unique ID system to stop fake products. We recognize farmers as our main assets. They provide herbal and organic products on contract farming. The company takes various initiatives for farmers to raise their income and provide surety towards sale of their produce.
PAL Company Details
patanjali-ayurved-limited
10,001+ employees
134580
339
Manufacturing
patanjaliayurved.org
Scan still pending
PAT_1316988
In-progress
PAL Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
PAL Global Score.png)
Patanjali Ayurved Limited Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Patanjali Ayurved Limited Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Patanjali Ayurved Limited Company Subsidiaries
Patanjali Ayurved Limited was established in 2006 with a thought of rural and urban development. The company is not merely an organization but a thought of creating a healthy society through Yog and Ayurved. We value our consumers and we believe by providing quality products a quality life for them can be created. This is our primary apprehension and thus, we try to take every measure to ensure quality like the Unique ID system to stop fake products. We recognize farmers as our main assets. They provide herbal and organic products on contract farming. The company takes various initiatives for farmers to raise their income and provide surety towards sale of their produce.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
PAL Cyber Security News
SWOT Analysis of Patanjali (Updated 2025)
Patanjali Strengths ยท 1. Association with Baba Ramdev ยท 2. Pricing Strategy ยท 3. Launch of New Products ยท 4. Ayurveda and Herbal ยท 5. Strongย ...
India Cyber Security Services Market Projected to Reach USD 7.83 Billion by 2033
India cyber security services market was USD 2.48 Billion in 2024 and is expected to be USD 7.83 Billion by 2033 with a growth rate of 13.60%ย ...
India Cyber Security Services Market Expanding at a CAGR of 13.60% during 2025-2033
Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach USD 7.83 Billion by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 13.60% during 2025-2033.
India Cyber Security Services Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by 2025-2033
The India cyber security services market is poised for major growth. This growth results from more cyberattacks, rapid digital changes, and aย ...
Indian guru Baba Ramdev expands into private security
Baba Ramdev, the Indian yoga guru turned entrepreneur who has been challenging consumer goods giants Nestlรฉ, Colgate and Unilever,ย ...
An Indian Yoga Guru's Consumer Products Brand, Patanjali, Is Making Global And Domestic Rivals Sweat
Patanjali Ayurved is now India's fastest-growing consumer products brand. Established domestic and global competitors are unnerved by the rocketing sales.
Tata International to nearly double sustainable leather production in 4 yrs
The company launched Phoenix Leather, an eco-friendly product under its Earthcare Leather range, Tata International said in a statement. Thisย ...
Now Yoga Guru Ramdev's Patanjali to Launch Private Security Firm
Baba Ramdev's vast empire will now include his own security firm, which will offer army-like training for young men and women.
Yoga guru Ramdev's Patanjali takes on WhatsApp with Kimbho, but does a vanishing act
Yoga guru Ramdev's Patanjali takes on WhatsApp with Kimbho, but does a vanishing act ... Facebook Inc.-owned WhatsApp, the most popular chat appย ...
PAL Similar Companies
Tramontina
More than just numbers, what truly defines Tramontina is the constant effort to make people's lives better. The small iron mill founded by Valentin and Elisa Tramontina in 1911 in southern Brazil was the beginning of a group that now encompasses 9 manufacturing units and has kept the century-old tra
Drรคger
Drรคger is an international leader in the fields of medical and safety technology. The family-owned company was founded in Lรผbeck, Germany, in 1889. The companyโs long-term success is based on the four key strengths of its value-driven culture: customer intimacy, professional employees, continuous in
the LEGO Group
We are the LEGO Group, the company behind the worldโs most loved LEGOยฎ bricks. Our brand name derived from the two Danish words Leg Godt, which mean โPlay Wellโ. Weโve been sparking imaginations and inspiring the builders of tomorrow since 1932. This is our mission and what motivates our colleague
Arรงelik Tรผrkiye
Arรงelik Tรผrkiye olarak, "Dรผnyaya Saygฤฑlฤฑ Dรผnyada Saygฤฑn" misyonuyla yola รงฤฑkฤฑyoruz ve teknoloji, insan kaynaฤฤฑ ve รผretim gรผcรผmรผzรผ sรผrdรผrรผlebilir bir gelecek iรงin kullanฤฑyoruz. 1955 yฤฑlฤฑnda baลlayan yolculuฤumuz bugรผn, 22 marka, 46 รผretim tesisi, 55.000 รงalฤฑลan ve 58 รผlkedeki 125 iลtirak ile global
Steel Authority of India Limited
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) traces its origin to the formative years of an emerging nation - India. After independence, the steel sector was to propel the economic growth and rapid industrialization of the country, and since 1973, SAIL steel has played a pivotal role in transforming the
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
For the builders and protectors, for the makers and explorers, for those shaping and reshaping our world through hard work and inspiration, Stanley Black & Decker provides the tools and innovative solutions you can trust to get the job doneโand we have since 1843. You repair your home and car with
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PAL CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PAL has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, PAL has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Patanjali Ayurved Limited was established in 2006 with a thought of rural and urban development. The company is not merely an organization but a thought of creating a healthy society through Yog and Ayurved. We value our consumers and we believe by providing quality products a quality life for them can be created. This is our primary apprehension and thus, we try to take every measure to ensure quality like the Unique ID system to stop fake products. We recognize farmers as our main assets. They provide herbal and organic products on contract farming. The company takes various initiatives for farmers to raise their income and provide surety towards sale of their produce..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
