Panasonic North America Company Cyber Security Posture

bit.ly

Panasonic is a leading technology provider of electric batteries and consumer lifestyle technologies, as well as innovative smart mobility, sustainable energy, and integrated supply chain solutions. Throughout Panasonicโ€™s 100-year history, one of our guiding principles has always been to contribute to society by improving peopleโ€™s lives and making the world a better place. The goal? To fulfill our Founderโ€™s vision of making today better than yesterday, tomorrow better than today by empowering people to live better lives and creating a brighter future for everyone. Learn more about Panasonicโ€™s technologies and solutions at https://na.panasonic.com.

PNA Company Details

Linkedin ID:

panasonic-usa

Employees number:

11195 employees

Number of followers:

174375.0

NAICS:

335

Industry Type:

Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing

Homepage:

bit.ly

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

PAN_2540040

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scorePNA Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Panasonic North America Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Panasonic North America Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
PanasonicBreach100506/2021PAN224119422Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Tech giant Panasonic suffereed a data breach incident during June 2021 to November 2021 after its file server were accessed by an unauthorised party. The hackers infiltrated the servers and accessed sensitive data of job candidates including personal details of the candidates and other business-related information. This was the second incident with Panasonic after attackers had already released 4GB of data they had stolen from Panasonic India in November 2020.

PanasonicBreach100511/2021PAN1349111122Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Japanese electronics giant Panasonic suffered from a major security breach after an unidentified threat actor had gained access to its internal network. An internal investigation revealed that the breach had gained access to some information on a file server. The compromised information includes sensitive customer details, employee personal information, Panasonic technical files from the companyโ€™s domestic operations. They investigated the incident and took preventive steps.

PanasonicRansomware100604/2022PAN02215422Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Panasonic Canada was targeted by the Conti ransomware group recently in February 2021. The attack affected the company's systems, processes, and networks. The firm immediately investigated the incident and contained the malware, cleaned and restored servers, and rebuilt its applications.

PanasonicVulnerability10055/2025PAN356060525Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Panasonic fell victim to subdomain hijacking by the Hazy Hawk threat group, which exploited misconfigured DNS records to spread malware and perpetrate online scams. The attackers redirected users to malicious sites through abandoned cloud resources, compromising user trust and exposing them to fraudulent activities. The attack emphasizes the critical importance of DNS hygiene and automated monitoring to detect and mitigate such vulnerabilities.

Panasonic North America Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Panasonic is a leading technology provider of electric batteries and consumer lifestyle technologies, as well as innovative smart mobility, sustainable energy, and integrated supply chain solutions. Throughout Panasonicโ€™s 100-year history, one of our guiding principles has always been to contribute to society by improving peopleโ€™s lives and making the world a better place. The goal? To fulfill our Founderโ€™s vision of making today better than yesterday, tomorrow better than today by empowering people to live better lives and creating a brighter future for everyone. Learn more about Panasonicโ€™s technologies and solutions at https://na.panasonic.com.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=panasonic-usa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

PNA Cyber Security News

2025-06-05T09:30:54.000Z
Smart factory vision: Interview with robotics boss at Panasonic Connect

The vision of the โ€œsmart factoryโ€ has moved from a futuristic concept to a critical strategic goal for manufacturers worldwide.

2024-11-26T08:00:00.000Z
Starbucks and other retailers hit with ongoing ransomware attack on software provider

Blue Yonder, which provides supply-chain software to retailers including Starbucks, was hit with a ransomware attack ahead of Thanksgiving.

2024-11-26T08:00:00.000Z
Starbucks bosses using pen and paper to pay employees after ransomware attack

Starbucks managers are using pen and paper to track employee schedules after a ransomware attack affected a third-party software supplier.

2025-01-31T08:00:00.000Z
Trump Views Raise Questions for De Soto Panasonic Plant

The mammoth $4 billion Panasonic electric vehicle battery plant nearing completion on the western edge of Kansas City is the biggestย ...

2024-12-18T08:00:00.000Z
SWOT Analysis of Panasonic (Updated 2025)

Panasonic is known for its innovative research and development, excellent customer service, and efficient operations despite intense rivalry.

2024-07-25T07:00:00.000Z
VIDEO | North Korean charged in ransomware attacks on American hospitals

A man who officials say worked for one of North Korea's military intelligence agencies was indicted in connection to alleged ransomewareย ...

2024-09-25T07:00:00.000Z
Top 10 IP Camera Companies | Best Viewing Tech

IP camera companies provide digital video cameras that transmit data over a network, enabling remote viewing and recording.

2023-01-16T08:00:00.000Z
Virtualization Security Solution Developing VERZEUSE for Virtualization Extensions: Contributing to the Cybersecurity of Next-generation Cockpit Systems | Automotive Equipment | Products & Solutions | Press Release

Panasonic Automotive Systems developed a virtualization security innovation that protects next-generation cockpit systems in cooperation with aย ...

2022-04-21T07:00:00.000Z
Panasonic Admits Suffering a Second Cyber Attack in 6 Months With Conti Ransomware Gang Claiming Responsibility

The Conti ransomware group claimed responsibility for the attack. The group claims to have stolen 2.8 gigabytes of data from Panasonic Canada.

similarCompanies

PNA Similar Companies

FOTILE

Ningbo FOTILE Kitchen Ware Co., Ltd. was founded in 1996,and specializes in electric and gas appliances, integrated kitchen solutions, R & D, manufacturing, sales and is devoted to providing technical, humanized and expert solutions for every family kitchen. FOTILE has now become the leading brand i

PIAL LEGRAND DO BRASIL

Fundada em 1948, a Pial tornou-se nas dรฉcadas seguintes a lรญder brasileira em interruptores e tomadas. Em 1977 foi adquirida pelo Grupo Legrand com sede em Limoges-Franรงa ampliando, ainda mais, a oferta de materiais elรฉtricos para baixa tensรฃo com a introduรงรฃo de novas tecnologias reconhecidas mundi

Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited (or BSPHCL), also known as erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board (or BSEB) is a state-owned electricity regulation board operating within the state of Bihar in India. Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB) was established in 1958 as a statutory corporation u

Midea Group

Midea Group aspires to the vision of โ€œBringing Great Innovations to Lifeโ€, upholding the Foundersโ€™ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in five major business areas: Smart Home Business, Industrial and

Molex

Molex makes a connected world possible by enabling technologies that transform the future and improve lives. With a presence in more than 40 countries, Molex offers a complete range of connectivity products, services and solutions for the data communications, medical, industrial, automotive and cons

Cairo Electricity Production Company

*Five companies produce electric power in the Arab Republic of Egypt follow to the Egyptian Electricity Holding Company, which is following to Ministry of Electricity and Energy. Cairo electricity production Company contributes by 20% of the total electrical energy produced by the production compa

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

PNA CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PNA has faced 4 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach', 'Vulnerability', 'Ransomware'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Panasonic is a leading technology provider of electric batteries and consumer lifestyle technologies, as well as innovative smart mobility, sustainable energy, and integrated supply chain solutions. Throughout Panasonicโ€™s 100-year history, one of our guiding principles has always been to contribute to society by improving peopleโ€™s lives and making the world a better place. The goal? To fulfill our Founderโ€™s vision of making today better than yesterday, tomorrow better than today by empowering people to live better lives and creating a brighter future for everyone. Learn more about Panasonicโ€™s technologies and solutions at https://na.panasonic.com..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach'].

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge